Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:58:47.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selectivity of Dinoseb in an Isoparaffinic Oil Carrier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. J. Burr  and
G. F. Warren
R. J. Burr
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana 47907
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative susceptibility of 40 plant species to postemergence applications of 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinoseb) in isoparaffinic oil was determined. Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Holland Virginia 56R’), with an I50 of greater than 2.24 kg/ha, were the most tolerant, and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) seedlings, with an I50 of 0.011 kg/ha, were the most susceptible. This is greater than a 200-fold difference in susceptibility, due primarily to internal tolerance, because penetration differences were reduced with the isoparaffinic oil carrier. Legumes generally were the most tolerant, and grasses ranged from tolerant to the most susceptible. Several species, primarily grasses, showed greater than 25% inhibition of shoot fresh weight from the isoparaffinic oil carrier alone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , November 1971 , pp. 706 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Isoparaffinic oil as a carrier for chlorpropham and terbacil. Weed Sci. 18:365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Blackman, G. E., Templeman, W. G., and Halliday, D. J. 1951. Herbicides and selective phytotoxicity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 2:199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchholtz, K. P. 1949. Use of herbicides on seedling and established legumes. Proc. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 6:71–72.Google Scholar
4. Burr, R. J. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Enhancement of herbicide activity with an isoparaffinic oil carrier. Weed Sci. 19:701–705.Google Scholar
5. Burt, E. O. 1956. Pre- and postemergence herbicides in peanuts. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 9:40–47.Google Scholar
6. Coulter, L. L. 1951. Experiments with DNOSBP for preemergence and postemergence weed control in lima beans. Proc. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 8:37–38.Google Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S. 1946. Selectivity of herbicides. Plant Physiol. 21:345–361.Google Scholar
8. Hauser, E. W., Shaw, W. C., Harrison, H. F., and Parham, S. A. 1962. Herbicides and herbicide mixtures for weed control in peanuts. Weeds 10:139–144.Google Scholar
9. Mellor, R. S. and Salisbury, F. B. 1965. Influence of light regime on the toxicity and physiological activity of herbicides. Plant Physiol. 40:506–512.Google Scholar
10. Miller, M. W. 1953. Pea weed control. Proc. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:26–27.Google Scholar
11. Schroeder, M. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Relative sensitivity of several plants to dinoseb. Weed Sci. 19:671–674.Google Scholar
12. Simon, E. W. 1953. Mechanism of dinitrophenol toxicity. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philosoph. Soc. 28:453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Watson, A. J. and Nation, H. A. 1959. Response of peanuts and annual weeds to early postemergence applications of the alkanolamine salt of DNBP. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 12:95–100.Google Scholar
14. Witherspoon, A. G. and Rodgers, E. G. 1954. Comparative “Premerge” preemergence and postemergence treatments for control of annual weeds in peanut fields. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 7:151–153.Google Scholar
15. Wojtaszek, T. 1966. Relationship between susceptibility of plants to DNBP and their capacity for ATP generation. Weeds 14:125–129.Google Scholar
16. Wojtaszek, T., Cherry, J. H. and Warren, G. F. 1966. Effect of 4,6-dinitro-o-sec-butylphenol on phosphorus and accumulation and incorporation in tomato leaf disks. Plant Physiol. 41:34–38.Google Scholar