Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:28:59.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed Biology of the Invasive Species Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum) in Northwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dilinuer Shalimu ,
Juan Qiu ,
Dunyan Tan ,
Carol C. Baskin  and
Jerry M. Baskin
Dilinuer Shalimu
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, College of Grassland and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urümqi 830052, China
Juan Qiu
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, College of Grassland and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urümqi 830052, China
Dunyan Tan
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, College of Grassland and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urümqi 830052, China
Carol C. Baskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 and Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Jerry M. Baskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
*
Corresponding authors' E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Buffalobur is an invasive summer annual species in Xinjiang Province, China. Our purpose was to investigate certain aspects of the seed biology of this weedy species that might be useful in controlling it. In contrast to a previous report that fresh seeds have physical (water-impermeable seed coat) plus physiological (low growth potential of embryo) dormancy, our results, along with those of others, verify that the seeds have only physiological dormancy. The seed's coat is water-permeable, the embryo is fully developed at seed maturity, and dormancy can be broken by cold stratification in the field during winter and early spring. Fifty-five percent of seeds buried in the soil in autumn germinated in the soil the following May, and 53% of the remaining nongerminated seeds germinated when tested in light in the laboratory. Thus, about 20% of the seeds did not germinate but were viable, demonstrating that the species forms at least a short-lived persistent seed bank. This information will be useful in planning a management strategy for this highly invasive species in northwest China.

Keywords

Buffalobur, Solanum rostratum Dunal SOLRODormancygerminationinvasive speciessoil seed bank
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 219 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bakker, J. and Wilson, S. 2001. Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses. Plant Ecol. 157:117–125.Google Scholar
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego, CA Academic Press. 666 p.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1992. Seed germination biology of the weedy biennial Alliaria petiolata . Nat. Areas J. 12:191–197.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 2003. Classification, biogeography, and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. Pages 518–544 in Smith, R. D., Dickie, J. B., Linington, S. H., Pritchard, H. W., and Probert, R. J., eds. Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice. Kew, London, U.K. The Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 2004. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 14:1–16.Google Scholar
Bassett, I. J. and Munro, D. B. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 78. Solanum carolinense L. and Solanum rostratum Dunal. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:977–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M. and Aschehoug, E. T. 2000. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science. 290:521–523.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. M., Meyerson, L. A., and Saltonstall, K. 1999. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetland of North America. Aquat. Bot. 64:261–273.Google Scholar
Cho, Y. H. and Kim, W. 1997. A new naturalized plant in Korea. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 27:277.Google Scholar
Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, F., Xu, C., and Zhou, Y. L. 2005. The evaluation of potential fatalness for a kind of exotic species Solanum rostratum and strategies for its control. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. (Natur. Sci.) 41:420–424 [In Chinese].Google Scholar
Gorchov, D. L. and Trisel, D. E. 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol. 166:13–24.Google Scholar
He, J. Y., Khasbagan, Mongenqiqig, and M. Z. Hu. 2011. Solanum rostratum Dunal: a new invasive alien plant of Inner Mongolia, J. Inn. Mong. Norm.Univ. (Natur. Sci.) 40:288–290 [In Chinese].Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. 1996. Contributions of ecology to biological control. Ecology. 77:1963–1964.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. and Tan, D. Y. 2007. The potential and exotic invasive plant: Solanum rostratum . Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 45:675–685 [In Chinese].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. C. 1946. The comparative internal morphology of seeds. Am. Midl. Nat. 36:513–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, L. L. 1977. Category I—Weed survey. Southern States Research Reports. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:184–215.Google Scholar
Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Sci. 33:810–814.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA Freeman. 887 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 67:893–921.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1996. An agenda for invasion biology. Biol. Conserv. 78:3–9.Google Scholar
Walck, J. L. and Hidayati, S. N. 2004. Differences in light and temperature responses determine autumn versus spring germination for seeds of Schoenolirion croceum . Can. J. Bot. 82:1429–1437.Google Scholar
Wei, S. H., Zhang, C. X., Chen, X. Z., et al. 2010. Rapid and effective methods for breaking seed dormancy in buffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Sci. 58:141–146.Google Scholar
Wei, S. H., Zhang, C. X., Li, X. J., Cui, H. L., Huang, H. J., Cui, B. F., Meng, Q. H., and Zhang, H. J. 2009. Factors affecting Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum) seed germination and seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 57:521–525.Google Scholar
Wei, S. H., Zhang, C. X., Liu, Y., Huang, H. J., Meng, Q. H., Cui, H. L., and Li, X. J. 2007. Invasive weed species buffalobur (Solanum rostratum) and its risk assessment. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 23:347–351 [In Chinese].Google Scholar
Wilson, S. D. 1989. The suppression of native prairie by alien species introduced for revegetation. Landsc. Urban Plann. 17:113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H. and Wang, Q. L. 2007. The analysis of climate trends in cotton production areas in Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture. Mod. Agric. Sci. Tech. 11:96–97 [In Chinese].Google Scholar