Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:20:52.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal Photosynthesis and Partitioning of Nonstructural Carbohydrates in Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Russ W. Gesch*
Affiliation:
USDA–Agricultural Research Service, North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267
Debra Palmquist
Affiliation:
USDA–Agricultural Research Service, National Center for Agriculture Utilization Research, Peoria, IL 61604
James V. Anderson
Affiliation:
USDA–Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science Research, 1605 Albrecht Boulevard, Fargo, ND 58105-5674
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Previous evidence indicates that changes in well-defined phases of dormancy in underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge in late summer and autumn are regulated by complex sensing and signaling pathways involving aboveground sugar signals. However, little information exists concerning seasonal photosynthesis and carbohydrate partitioning of leafy spurge, although such information would help to elucidate the involvement of sugar in controlling bud dormancy. An outdoor study was conducted over two growing seasons to determine and model seasonal patterns of photosynthesis and aboveground carbohydrate partitioning and their relationship to underground adventitious bud carbohydrate status. Photosynthesis and total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) content of aboveground tissues was greatest during vegetative growth. Photosynthesis gradually declined over the growing season, whereas TNC decreased sharply during flowering, followed by a gradual decline between midsummer and autumn. Leaf starch increased dramatically to midsummer before declining sharply throughout late summer and early autumn, whereas sucrose content responded inversely, indicating a mobilization of starch reserves and export of sugars to overwintering belowground sink tissues. Because newly formed underground adventitious buds showed a continuous increase in TNC from midsummer through autumn, export of sugars from aboveground tissues likely contributed to the increase in TNC. These results may facilitate new strategies for biological control of leafy spurge.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J. V., Chao, W. S., and Horvath, D. P. 2001. A current review on the regulation of dormancy in vegetative buds. Weed Sci. 49:581589.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. V., Gesch, R. W., Jia, Y., Chao, W. S., and Horvath, D. P. 2005. Seasonal shifts in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge. Plant Cell Environ. 28:15671578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangsund, D. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Leitch, J. A. 1999. Assessing economic impacts of biological control of weeds: the case of leafy spurge in northern Great Plains of the United States. J. Environ. Manag. 56:3543.Google Scholar
[CAB] CAB International 2004. Euphorbia esula [original text by W. Chao and J. V. Anderson]. In:. Crop Protection Compendium, 2004 ed. Wallingford, UK CAB International. [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
Chao, W. S., Anderson, J. V., Gesch, R. W., and Horvath, D. P. 2006. Sugars, hormones, and environment affect the dormancy status in underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 54:5968.Google Scholar
Coupland, R. T., Selleck, G. W., and Alex, J. F. 1955. Distribution of vegetative buds on the underground parts of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L). Can. J. Ag. and Sci. 35:161167.Google Scholar
Cyr, D. R. and Bewley, J. D. 1989. Carbon and nitrogen reserves of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) roots as related to overwintering strategy. Physiol. Plant. 77:6772.Google Scholar
Galtier, N., Foyer, C. H., Murchie, E., Alred, R., Quick, W. P., Voelker, T. A., Thépenier, C., Lascève, G., and Betsche, T. 1995. Effect of light and atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in the leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants over-expressing sucrose phosphate synthase. J. Exp. Bot. 46:13351344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. and Patterson, B. D. 1982. Responses of plants to low, nonfreezing temperatures: protein, metabolism, and acclimation. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:347372.Google Scholar
Grbić, V. and Bleecker, A. B. 1995. Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 8 (4):595602.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. J. and Nowierski, R. M. 1988. Release of postsenescent dormancy in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) by chilling. Weed Sci. 36:784786.Google Scholar
Hattenbach, A., Müller-Röber, B., Nast, G., and Heineke, D. 1997. Antisense repression of both ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and triose phosphate translocator modifies carbohydrate partitioning in potato leaves. Plant Physiol. 115:471475.Google Scholar
Horvath, D. P. 1998. The role of specific plant organs and polar auxin transport in correlative inhibition of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) root buds. Can. J. Bot. 76:12271231.Google Scholar
Horvath, D. P. 1999. Role of mature leaves in inhibition of root bud growth in Euphorbia esula L. Weed Sci. 47:544550.Google Scholar
Horvath, D. P., Anderson, J. V., Chao, W. S., and Foley, M. E. 2003. Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci. 8:534540.Google Scholar
Horvath, D. P., Chao, W. S., and Anderson, J. V. 2002. Molecular analysis of signals controlling dormancy and growth in underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L). Plant Physiol. 128:14391446.Google Scholar
LeTourneau, D. 1957. A note on the sugars and amino acids of leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula . Weeds. 4:275277.Google Scholar
Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A. 1996. Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: methods, models, and results. Impact Assess. 14:419433.Google Scholar
Levitt, J. 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Volume 1. New York Academic.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1987. Carbohydrates in leafy spurge roots as influenced by environment. J. Range Manag. 40:139144.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1991. Correlation of environment and root carbohydrate content to picloram translocation in leafy spurge. J. Range Manag. 44:254258.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. Evidence of competition for water as a factor in the mechanism of root bud inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 57:25722581.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. I. 1972. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula: the influence of the nitrogen supply on the correlative inhibition of root bud activity. Can. J. Bot. 50:949956.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. A. 1979. Studies on the reproductive biology of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 27:106109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, S. J. and Foley, M. E. 1987. Euphorbia esula L. root and root bud indole-3-acetic acid levels at three phenologic stages. Plant Physiol. 84:287290.Google Scholar
Shafer, N. E. and Monson, W. G. 1958. The role of gibberellic acid in overcoming bud dormancy in perennial weeds, ie. leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) and ironweed (Vernonia baldwinii Torr). Weeds. 6:172178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signora, L., Galtier, N., Skøt, L., Lucas, H., and Foyer, C. H. 1998. Over-expression of sucrose phosphate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana results in increased foliar sucrose/starch ratios and favours decreased foliar carbohydrate accumulation in plants after prolonged growth with CO2 enrichment. J. Exp. Bot. 49:669680.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. 1992. Developmental and environmental effects on assimilate partitioning in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 40:7985.Google Scholar
Welling, A., Moritz, T., Palva, E. T., and Juntilla, O. 2002. Independent activation of cold acclimation by low temperature and short photoperiod in hybrid aspen. Plant Physiol. 129:16331641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed