Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Peters, Michael A.
Jandrić, Petar
Irwin, Ruth
Locke, Kirsten
Devine, Nesta
Heraud, Richard
Gibbons, Andrew
Besley, Tina
White, Jayne
Forster, Daniella
Jackson, Liz
Grierson, Elizabeth
Mika, Carl
Stewart, Georgina
Tesar, Marek
Brighouse, Susanne
Arndt, Sonja
Lazaroiu, George
Mihaila, Ramona
Legg, Catherine
and
Benade, Leon
2016.
Towards a philosophy of academic publishing.
Educational Philosophy and Theory,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 14,
p.
1401.
Andoohgin Shahri, Mona
Jazi, Mohammad Davarpanah
Borchardt, Glenn
and
Dadkhah, Mehdi
2017.
Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Frandsen, Tove Faber
2017.
Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 113,
Issue. 3,
p.
1513.
Dadkhah, Mehdi
Seno, Seyed Amin Hosseini
and
Borchardt, Glenn
2017.
Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals; guidelines for improving security.
European Journal of Internal Medicine,
Vol. 38,
Issue. ,
p.
25.
Grančay, Martin
Vveinhardt, Jolita
and
Šumilo, Ērika
2017.
Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 3,
p.
1813.
Richtig, G.
Berger, M.
Lange‐Asschenfeldt, B.
Aberer, W.
and
Richtig, E.
2018.
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 9,
p.
1441.
Demir, Selcuk Besir
2018.
Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?.
Journal of Informetrics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
1296.
Al-Khatib, Aceil
and
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
2019.
Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research.
Biochemia medica,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
200.
Padmalochanan, Padmapriya
2019.
Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches.
Publishing Research Quarterly,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Frandsen, Tove Faber
2019.
How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists.
Learned Publishing,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
221.
Cukier, Samantha
Helal, Lucas
Rice, Danielle B.
Pupkaite, Justina
Ahmadzai, Nadera
Wilson, Mitchell
Skidmore, Becky
Lalu, Manoj M.
and
Moher, David
2020.
Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review.
BMC Medicine,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
Demir, Selcuk Besir
2020.
Scholarly databases under scrutiny.
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Eshchanov, Bahtiyor
Abduraimov, Kobilbek
Ibragimova, Mavluda
and
Eshchanov, Ruzumboy
2021.
Efficiency of “Publish or Perish” Policy—Some Considerations Based on the Uzbekistan Experience.
Publications,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
33.
Benade, Leon
2021.
Writing for Publication.
p.
141.
Dadkhah, Mehdi
Rahimnia, Fariborz
and
Memon, Aamir Raoof
2023.
Facilitators and barriers to dealing with questionable journals in management science.
Library Hi Tech,
El Bairi, Khalid
Fourtassi, Maryam
El Fatimy, Rachid
and
El Kadmiri, Nadia
2023.
Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience.
International Journal for Educational Integrity,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
Cooke, Steven J.
Young, Nathan
Peiman, Kathryn S.
Roche, Dominique G.
Clements, Jeff C.
Kadykalo, Andrew N.
Provencher, Jennifer F.
Raghavan, Rajeev
DeRosa, Maria C.
Lennox, Robert J.
Robinson Fayek, Aminah
Cristescu, Melania E.
Murray, Stuart J.
Quinn, Joanna
Cobey, Kelly D.
Browman, Howard I.
and
Dufour, Paul
2024.
A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections.
FACETS,
Vol. 9,
Issue. ,
p.
1.