Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:32:17.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retention, Absorption, and Loss of Foliage-Applied Metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Daniel L. Devlin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Larry A. Morrow
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164

Abstract

Immediately following postemergence application, similar quantities of metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] were retained on the foliage of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L. # BROTE) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Three days following treatment, more metribuzin was present on the surface of the foliage of downy brome than of winter wheat and similar quantities of metribuzin had been absorbed into the interior of the foliage of both species. Fourteen days after treatment, metribuzin had disappeared from the surfaces of the foliage of both species but more metribuzin was present in the interior of the foliage of downy brome than of winter wheat. Results from petri dish studies in the field suggested that the amount of unaltered metribuzin available for absorption by leaves was influenced primarily by volatilization and secondarily by photodecomposition. In addition, small quantities of rainfall may have washed metribuzin from leaf surfaces. In 1984, yield of winter wheat was greater in metribuzin-treated plots than in nontreated check plots.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Devlin, D. L., Gealy, D. R., and Morrow, L. A. 1987. Differential absorption and translocation of metribuzin by downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:15.Google Scholar
2. Foy, C. A. 1964. Volatilization of eight triazine derivatives. Weeds. 12:103108.Google Scholar
3. Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., and Stark, J. C. 1986. Metribuzin absorption and translocation in two barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars. Weed Sci. 34:491495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kearney, P. C., Sheets, T. J., and Smith, J. W. 1964. Volatility of seven s-triazines. Weeds. 12:8387.Google Scholar
5. Klemmedson, J. O. and Smith, J. G. 1964. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Bot. Rev. 30:226262.Google Scholar
6. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczekski, K. A. 1976. Vaporization and uptake of atrazine with additives. Weed Sci. 24:217223.Google Scholar
7. Papendick, R. I. and Miller, D. E. 1977. Conservation tillage in the Pacific Northwest. J. Soil Water Conserv. 32:4956.Google Scholar
8. Rydrych, D. J. and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in winter wheat. Agron. J. 601:279280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Savage, K. E. 1980. Metribuzin persistence on the soil surface. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 33:288.Google Scholar
10. Thompson, L. Jr. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Foliar and root absorption of atrazine applied postemergence to giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 17:251256.Google Scholar
11. Thompson, L. Jr. and Slife, F. W. 1970. Root and foliar absorption of atrazine applied postemergence to broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. 18:349351.Google Scholar
12. Wicks, G. A., Burnside, O. C., and Fenster, C. R. 1971. Influence of soil type and depth of planting on downy brome seeds. Weed Sci. 19:8286.Google Scholar