Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:40:43.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Rice Flatsedge (Cyperus iria) and Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to Rice Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bhagirath S. Chauhan  and
David E. Johnson
Bhagirath S. Chauhan*
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines
David E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rice flatsedge and barnyardgrass are widespread and competitive weeds in direct-seeded rice. Developing integrated weed management strategies that elevate suppression of weeds by rice through crop density, nutrition, and cultivar choice requires better understanding of the extent to which rice interferes with the growth of these weeds and how these species respond to resource limitation with crop interference. Rice interference reduced the height of barnyardgrass but did not affect height of rice flatsedge. These weed species were able to grow taller than rice and thus avoided being shaded. Increased specific stem length under crop interference may demonstrate a strategy of stem elongation to allow the top portion of the weeds to be kept out of shade. Rice interference reduced inflorescence and shoot biomass of both weed species. Barnyardgrass showed the ability to reduce the effects of rice interference by increasing leaf weight ratio. The present study shows that crop interference alone may reduce weed growth but may not give complete control of these weed species. This highlights the need for the integration of management practices to achieve control of these weed species.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv., ECHCGrice flatsedge, Cyperus iria L. CYPIRrice, Oryza sativa LLightcompetitiondirect-seeded riceweedbiomassseed
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 204 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Azmi, M., Chin, D. V., Vongsaroj, P., and Johnson, D. E. 2005. Emerging issues in weed management of direct-seeded rice in Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Pages 196–198. in. Rice is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute and Tsukuba, Japan: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Bayer, D. E. and Hill, J. E. 1992. Weeds. Pages 32–55. in Flint, M. L. and Ohleneger, B. P. O. eds. Integrated Pest Management for Rice. Oakland, CA: University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management Project, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 3280.Google Scholar
Caton, B. P., Foin, T. C., and Hill, J. E. 1997. Phenotypic plasticity of Ammannia spp. in competition with rice. Weed Res. 37:33–38.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 332.Google Scholar
Dingkuhn, M., Johnson, D. E., Sow, A., and Audebert, A. Y. 1999. Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crops Res. 61:79–95.Google Scholar
Galinato, M. I., Moody, K., and Piggin, C. M. 1999. Upland Rice Weeds of South and Southeast Asia. Makati City, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 156.Google Scholar
Garrity, D. P., Movillon, M., and Moody, K. 1992. Differential weed suppression ability in upland rice cultivars. Agron. J. 84:586–591.Google Scholar
GenStat 8.0 2005. GenStat Release 8 Reference Manual. Oxford, UK: VSN International. 343.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D. and Fischer, A. J. 2001. Relative growth and photosynthetic response of water-seeded rice and Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch to shade. Int. J. Pest Manage. 47:305–309.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D. and Fischer, A. J. 2004. Competitiveness of rice cultivars as a tool for crop-based weed management. Pages 517–537. in Inderjit, , ed. Weed Biology and Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Fischer, A. J., and Foin, T. C. 2001. Shading and the growth and photosynthetic responses of Ammannia coccinnea . Weed Res. 41:59–67.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Hill, J. E., Foin, T. C., Caton, B. P., and Fischer, A. J. 2000. Differences in cultivar interference with watergrass (Echinochloa spp) growth in water-seeded rice. Agron. J. 93:326–332.Google Scholar
Grundy, A. C., Mead, A., Burston, S., and Overs, T. 2004. Seed production of Chenopodium album in competition with field vegetables. Weed Res. 44:271–281.Google Scholar
Håkansson, S. 2003. Weeds and Weed Management on Arable Land—An Ecological Approach. Wallingford, UK: CABI. 288.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic. 892.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Bayer, D. E. 1994. Rice weed control: current technology and emerging issues in the United States. Pages 377–391. in. Proceedings of the Temperate Rice Conference. New South Wales, Australia: NSW Agriculture.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. 609.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant responses to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474–482.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. and Mortimer, A. M. 2008. Issues for weed management in direct-seeded rice and the development of decision-support frameworks. Pages 223–228. in Singh, Y., Singh, V. P., Chauhan, B., Orr, A., Mortimer, A. M., Johnson, D. E., and Hardy, B. eds. Direct Seeding of Rice and Weed Management in the Irrigated Rice–Wheat Cropping System of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute and Pantnagar, India: Directorate of Experiment Station, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology.Google Scholar
Labrada, R. 1997. Problems Related to the Development of Weed Management in the Developing World. www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Weeds/Download/auldwec.pdf. Accessed: May 7, 2009.Google Scholar
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. III, and Pons, T. L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. New York: Springer Verlag. 540.Google Scholar
Lubigan, R. T. and Vega, M. R. 1971. The effect on yield of the competition of rice with Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. and Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. f.) Presl. Philippine Agriculturalist. 55:210–213.Google Scholar
Moorthy, B. T. S. and Das, T. K. 1998. Threshold level of weed umbrella sedge (Cyperus iria) in upland rice (O. sativa) under rainfed direct-seeded condition. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68:7–8.Google Scholar
Mortimer, M. 1997. The Need for Studies on Weed Ecology to Improve Weed Management. www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Weeds/Download/auldwec.pdf. Accessed: May 7, 2009.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. 2003. Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyardgrass) seed rain under irrigated conditions. Asp. App. Biol. 69:163–170.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1979. The effects of shading on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata). Weed Sci. 27:549–553.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1995. Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci. 43:483–490.Google Scholar
Primot, S., Valentin-Morrison, M., and Makowski, D. 2006. Predicting the risk of weed infestation in winter oilseed rape crops. Weed Res. 46:22–33.Google Scholar
Rao, A. N., Johnson, D. E., Sivaprasad, B., Ladha, J. K., and Mortimer, A. M. 2007. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv. Agron. 93:153–255.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. 2000. C3 versus C4 photosynthesis in rice: ecophysiological perspective. Pages 13–35. in Sheehy, J. E., Mitchell, P. L., and Hardy, B. eds. Redesigning Rice Photosynthesis to Increase Yield. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Schlichting, C. D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:667–693.Google Scholar