Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:31:30.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to Preemergence Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. H. Crowley
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, located at Southeast Res. and Ext. Center, Monticello, AR 71655
D. H. Teem
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
G. A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn, AL 36830
C. S. Hoveland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn, AL 36830

Abstract

Responses of six morningglories (Ipomoea spp.) and two Cassia spp. to 13 preemergence applied herbicides were determined at two locations in southern Alabama. Pitted (I. lacunosa L.), cypressvine (I. quamoclit L.), and willowleaf morningglories (I. wrightii Gray) were readily controlled with metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one]; entireleaf [I. hederacea (L.) Jacq. var. integriuscula Gray], tall [I. purpurea (L.) Roth.], and ivyleaf morningglories [I. hederacea (L.) Jacq.] were not controlled. Norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinone] controlled cypressvine morningglory, but did not adequately control the other morningglory species. Perfluidone {1,1,1-trifluoro-N-[2-methyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)phenyl] methanesulfonamide} gave acceptable control of cypressvine and willowleaf morningglories, but gave poor control of other morningglory species. Sicklepod (C. obtusifolia L.) was controlled better than coffee senna (C. occidentalis L.) with 2.2 kg/ha diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] and 2.2 kg/ha cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropionitrile} controlled sicklepod better than coffee senna at one location each. Oxadiazon [2-tert-butyl-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-δ2-1,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one] was more effective in controlling coffee senna than sicklepod. Induction of population shifts toward incidental species of these genera seems unlikely based on the herbicides included in these experiments. In most cases the incidental species were more readily controlled than the prominent weed species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baldwin, F. L. and Frans, R. D. 1972. Soybean and weed response to dinoseb and chloroxuron applied topically. Weed Sci. 20:511514.Google Scholar
2. Beste, C. E. 1972. Control of Ipomoea L. spp. in sweet corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:3640.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Hoveland, C. S., Brown, V. L., and Wade, R. H. 1975. Weed population shifts influenced by crop rotations and weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:6071.Google Scholar
4. Hogue, C. W. and Kirby, M. G. 1975. Oxadiazon for preemergence weed control in soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:335.Google Scholar
5. Oliver, D., Lambert, B., and James, A. 1974. Sicklepod control in soybeans; a systems approach. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Ark. Farm Res. 23(3):4.Google Scholar
6. Orwick, P. L., and Schreiber, M. M. 1975. Differential root growth of four Setaria taxa. Weed Sci. 23:364368.Google Scholar
7. Romanowski, R. R. and Warren, G. F. 1973. Research results with metribuzin in tomatoes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 28:68.Google Scholar
8. Santelmann, P. W. and Evetts, L. 1971. Germination and herbicide susceptibility of six pigweed species. Weed Sci. 19:5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Skroch, W. A., Sheets, T. J., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Weed populations and herbicide residues in apple orchards after 5 years. Weed Sci. 23:5357.Google Scholar
10. Smith, T. S. and Rahn, E. M. 1972. Herbicide combinations for control of problem weeds in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:116123.Google Scholar