Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:01:24.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Weeds to Tillage and Cover Crop Residue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John R. Teasdale
Affiliation:
Weed Sci. Lab., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Beltsville, MD 20705, Univ. Maryland, Salisbury, MD 21801
C. Edward Beste
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Maryland, Salisbury, MD 21801
William E. Potts
Affiliation:
Univ. Maryland/U.S. Dep. Agric. Consulting Serv., Beltsville, MD

Abstract

Total weed density increased after 1 yr of no-tillage and after 2 yr of conventional tillage in a 4-yr experiment with repeated assignment of the same treatment to the same plots. Large crabgrass, goosegrass, and carpetweed densities were higher in the no-tillage compared with the conventional-tillage treatment in at least 1 yr whereas common lambsquarters density was greater in the conventional-tillage treatment the last year of the experiment. Within the no-tillage treatment, rye or hairy vetch residue reduced total weed density an average of 78% compared to the treatment without cover crop when cover crop biomass exceeded 300 g m–2 and when residue covered more than 90% of the soil. Goosegrass, stinkgrass, and carpetweed densities were reduced by cover crop residue in at least 1 yr whereas large crabgrass was unaffected. Common lambsquarters density increased where rye was grown as a cover crop prior to conventional tillage. Despite differences in weed density among treatments, weed biomass was equivalent in all treatments during the last 2 yr.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., Burke, B. A., and Aasen, A. J. 1987. Isolation and characterization of allelochemicals in rye herbage. Phytochemistry 26:13851390.Google Scholar
2. Berry, D. A. 1987. Logarithmic transformation in ANOVA. Biometrics 43:439456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail and velvetleaf density and control in corn. Weed Sci. 36:642647.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean. Weed Sci. 38:158165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chu, C. C., Ludford, P. M., Ozbun, J. L., and Sweet, R. D. 1978. Effects of temperature and competition on the establishment and growth of redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters. Crop Sci. 18:308310.Google Scholar
6. Cousens, R. and Moss, S. R. 1990. A model of the effects of cultivation on the vertical distribution of weed seeds within soil. Weed Res. 30:6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D.S.H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99109.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E. 1989. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in four tillage systems. Weed Sci. 37:239249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnson, W. C. III and Coble, H. D. 1986. Crop rotation and herbicide effects on the population dynamics of two annual grasses. Weed Sci. 34:452456.Google Scholar
10. Lapointe, A. M., Deschênes, J. M., Gervais, P., and Lemieux, C. 1984. Biologie du chénopode blanc: Influence du trevail du sol sur la levée et de la densité du peuplement sur la croissance. Can. J. Bot. 62:25872593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327335.Google Scholar
12. Peters, R. A. 1971. Large and small crabgrass. Conn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 415.Google Scholar
13. Putnam, A. R., DeFrank, J., and Barnes, J. P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:10011010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Roberts, H. A. and Dawkins, P. A. 1967. Effect of cultivation on the numbers of viable weed seeds in soil. Weed Res. 7:290301.Google Scholar
15. Roberts, H. A. and Potter, M. E. 1980. Emergence patterns of weed seedlings in relation to cultivation and rainfall. Weed Res. 20:377386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shilling, D. G., Jones, L. A., Worsham, A. D., Parker, C. E., and Wilson, R. F. 1986. Isolation and identification of some phytotoxic compounds from aqueous extracts of rye. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34:633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1985. Rye and wheat mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. Pages 243271 in Thompson, A. C., ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 268.Google Scholar
18. Weaver, S. E., Tan, C. S., and Brain, P. 1988. Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:877886.Google Scholar
19. White, R. H., Worsham, A. D., and Blum, U. 1989. Allelopathic potential of legume debris and aqueous extracts. Weed Sci. 37:674679.Google Scholar
20. Wiese, A. F., ed. 1985. Weed Control in Limited-Tillage Systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Monogr. No. 2. 297.Google Scholar
21. Wiese, A. M. and Binning, L. K. 1987. Calculating the threshold temperature of development for weeds. Weed Sci. 35:177179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wrucke, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Weed species distribution as influenced by tillage and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:853856.Google Scholar