Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:19:59.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Vegetable Crops to Sublethal Application of 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Delbert D. Hemphill Jr.  and
Marvin L. Montgomery
Delbert D. Hemphill Jr.
Affiliation:
No. Willamette Agric. Expt. Stn., Aurora, OR 97002
Marvin L. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Chem., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sublethal amounts of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid] were applied to several vegetable crops in order to determine effect on yield and quality in a simulated drift experiment. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and root crops were most sensitive to 2,4-D; as little as 2.1 g/ha of acid distorted tomato fruit shape and elongated radish (Raphanus sativus L.) roots. All root crops were rendered unmarketable by 10.4 g/ha and gross yields were reduced by exposure to 104 g/ha. Yield of peppers (Capsicum frutescens L. var. grossum) was increased by exposure to 2.1 g/ha and severely depressed by 104 g/ha. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit shape was distorted at 11 g/ha and yield was reduced slightly. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) were least sensitive to 2,4-D. Exposure to 20.8 g/ha did not reduce yields of lettuce or cabbage. Onion yields were reduced by application of 104 g/ha. Bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield was decreased by exposure to 22 g/ha, but potato (Solarium tuberosum L.) yield increased at 16 g/ha. Herbicide residues in the crop foliage were proportional to the degree of exposure. Residue analysis combined with foliar symptoms may be useful in predicting crop damage following 2,4-D drift.

Keywords

Brassica oleraceaPhaseolus vulgarisCucumis sativusLactuca sativaAllium cepaCapsicum frutescensSolanum tuberosumLycopersicon esculentumfoliar symptomsresiduesdrift
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , November 1981 , pp. 632 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carlin, A. F., Haung, T. T., and Weigle, J. L. 1971. Influence of sublethal concentrations of 2,4-D on tomato and tomato juice. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 96:138–141.Google Scholar
2. Chow, C., Montgomery, M. L., and Yu, T. C. 1971. Methodology and analysis for residues of MCP and 2,4,5-T in wheat. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 6:576–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Coyne, D. P. and Burnside, O. C. 1968. Differential plant injury and yield responses of tomato varieties to 2,4-D. Neb. Agr. Expt. Stn. Res. Bull. 226. 21 pp.Google Scholar
4. Guzman, V. L. 1956. Volatility and drift of 2,4-D as a cause of damage to untreated sensitive plants. Soil and Crop Sci. Soc. of Fla., Proc. 16:283–293.Google Scholar
5. Jordan, T. N. and Romanowski, R. R. 1974. Comparison of dicamba and 2,4-D injury to field-grown tomatoes. HortSci. 9:74–75.Google Scholar
6. Robbins, W. A. and Taylor, W. S. 1956. Damage to tomatoes from 2,4-D. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. p. 62.Google Scholar
7. Robbins, W. A. and Taylor, W. S. 1957. Injury to canning tomatoes caused by 2,4,-D. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 70: 373–378.Google Scholar
8. Schweizer, E. E. 1978. Response of sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) to sublethal rates of 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 26:629–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sherwood, C. H., Weigle, J. L., and Denisen, E. L. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: effects on growth of representative horticultural plants. HortSci. 5:211–213.Google Scholar
10. Takahashi, T. and Makayama, M. 1961. Studies on the coloration of tomato fruit. VI. The influence of hormone sprays on the growth and pigment contents of fruits. J. Japan Soc. Hort. Sci. 30:153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wedding, R. T., Kendrick, J. B., Stewart, W. S., and Hall, B. J. 1956. Growth regulators on beans. Calif. Agric. 10(4):4.Google Scholar
12. Weigle, J. L., Denisen, E. L., and Sherwood, C. H. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: effects on market quality of several horticultural crops. HortSci. 5:213–214.Google Scholar
13. Wort, D. J. 1959. The foliar application of 2,4-D and other growth regulators with and without added minor elements. Proc. IVth Intern. Congr. Crop Protection, Hamburg, 1:497–502.Google Scholar
14. Wort, D. J. 1962. The application of sublethal concentrations of 2,4-D, and in combination with mineral nutrients. World Rev. of Pest Control 1:6–19.Google Scholar