Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:27:03.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Range Vegetation to Grid Placement and Aerial Application of Karbutilate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. J. Scifres
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. (Dep. Range Sci.); College Station, 77843
J. L. Mutz
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. (Dep. Range Sci.); College Station, 77843
C. H. Meadors
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agric Res. and Ext. Center, Chilicothe-Vernon, Vernon, 76384

Abstract

Karbutilate [tert-butylcarbamic acid ester with 3(m-hydroxypheny)-1, 1-dimethylurea], formulated as a ball 1.34 cm in diameter, was applied to brush-infested rangeland with fixed-wing aircraft and in a grid pattern by hand at an average density of four balls/12.4 m2 (1.83-m spacing). Control of woody plants with karbutilate applied by hand in an exact grid pattern was not different from aerial applications at the same rate. Based on evaluations at least 24 months after application, karbutilate at 0.56 or 1.12 kg/ha did not control honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell] in the subhumid Post Oak Savannah or semiarid Rolling Plains of Texas. At 2.24 kg/ha, canopy reduction of honey mesquite averaged 70% with 20 to 25% of the population killed. Post oak (Quercus stellata Wangenh.), blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica Muenchh.), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.), or winged elm (Ulmus alata Michx.) in Post Oak Savannah were not killed by 2.24 kg/ha. Karbutilate eliminated all vegetation in a 25 to 45-cm diameter circle, depending on concentration of active ingredient in the ball, the year of treatment regardless of vegetation region. The bare areas were revegetated within 2 yr following application in the Post Oak Savannah. However, bare areas in sodgrasses, primarily tobosa [Hilaria mutica (Buckl.) Benth.] and buffalograss [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.], where 1.12 and 2.24 kg/ha were applied averaged 20 to 30 in diameter, respectively, 32 months after application to sandy clay loam in the Rolling Plains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Haas, R. H., Mayer, R. E., Scifres, C. J., and Brock, J. H. 1973. Growth and development of mesquite. Pages 1019 in Scifres, C. J., ed. Mesquite. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Monogr. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
2. Levy, E. B. and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method of pasture analysis. N. Z. J. Agric. 46:276279.Google Scholar
3. Mutz, J. L., Scifres, C. J., and Meadors, C. H. 1976. Response of honey mesquite and associated range vegetation to karbutilate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:244.Google Scholar
4. Scifres, C. J., Bovey, R. W., Fisher, C. E., and Baur, J. R. 1973. Chemical control of mesquite. Pages 2432 in Scifres, C. J., ed. Mesquite. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Monogr. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
5. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book C. Inc., New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
6. Strizke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255.Google Scholar
7. Wiedemann, H. T., Bouse, L. F., Haas, R. H., and Walter, J. F. 1973. Spray equipment, herbicide carriers and drift control. Pages 3345 in Scifres, C. J., ed. Mesquite. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Monogr. Vol. 1.Google Scholar