Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:12:16.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Prickly Sida and Soybeans to Various Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry S. Jeffery
Affiliation:
Univ. of Tennessee Inst. of Agr. located at Knoxville, Tenn., 37901
John Connell
Affiliation:
Ames Plantation, Grand Junction, TN 38039
Tom McCutchen
Affiliation:
Milan Field Sta., Milan, TN 38358
Joseph R. Overton
Affiliation:
West Tennessee Exp. Sta., Jackson, TN 38301

Abstract

Three preemergence and four postemergence herbicides were compared for control of prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.) in soybeans (Glycine max Merrill) and for level of phytotoxicity to soybeans. As a preemergence herbicide, chlorbromuron [3-(4-bromo-3-chlorophenyl)-1-methoxyl-1-methylurea] provided better control of prickly sida than did linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxyl-1-methylurea] which was more consistently effective than was naptalam (N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid) plus dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol). Chlorbromuron applied as a preemergence treatment caused slight crop injury. In most cases preemergence treatments followed by cultivation were effective in providing season-long control. The descending order of effectiveness for prickly sida control by the postemergence herbicides was: chlorbromuron metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] > prometryne [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] > dinoseb. Prometryne as a postemergence treatment following a preemergence herbicide increased prickly sida control more consistently than dinoseb used as the postemergence treatment. However, prometryne caused more crop injury than did dinoseb.

Comparison of soybean yields from the weedy and weed free checks show that prickly sida caused only 9 to 14% yield losses in soybeans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hudson, Robert. 1973. Annual Crop Summary. Tennessee Crop Reporting Service. 4 pp.Google Scholar
2. Ivy, , Baker, H.W. R.S. 1972. Prickly side control and competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137139.Google Scholar