Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:40:38.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Kochia Selections to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Allyn R. Bell ,
John D. Nalewaja  and
A. B. Schooler
Allyn R. Bell
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota, 58102
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota, 58102
A. B. Schooler
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota, 58102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thirteen selections of kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.), self-pollinated for four generations, varied in response to (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) and 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba). The most susceptible selection was injured more by 0.35 kg/ha of the dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D than the most tolerant by 0.70 kg/ha based on visual injury rating, growth in plant diameter relative to untreated controls, and seed production. The 0.28 kg/ha rate of dicamba injured the most susceptible selection as much as 0.54 kg/ha injured the most tolerant based on visual injury rating and change in plant diameter. Plant size and maturity influenced the response of kochia to herbicides, but the differences in response among selections could not be explained by variations in size or maturity. All kochia selections were tolerant to 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) at 4.28 kg/ha.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , September 1972 , pp. 458 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrol, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18:253–255.Google Scholar
2. Jacobsohn, R. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. Differential response of wild oat lines to diallate, triallate, and barban. Weed Sci. 16:491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rache, B. F. and Muzik, T. J. 1964. Ecological and physiological study of Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. and response of its biotypes to sodium 2,2-dichloropropionate (dalapon). Agron. J. 56:155–160.Google Scholar
4. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–615.Google Scholar
5. Santelmann, P. W. and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and S. faberi . Weeds 9:406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility influences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Snedecor, G. W. 1950. Statistical methods. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa. 534 p.Google Scholar
8. Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15: 275–280.Google Scholar