Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:31:14.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repeated, Foliar Applications of Herbicides on Johnsongrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. C. Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract

The responses of established, spaced-planted strains of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) to repeated, foliar applications of herbicides were studied under irrigated desert conditions. Monosodium methanearsonate (MSMA) and disodium methanearsonate (DSMA) were the most effective herbicides. Six to 10 applications with 3 to 6 lb aihg of either herbicide (totaling 24 to 60 1b/A) killed johnsongrass in most experiments. Treatments initiated in the fall were more effective than similar treatments started in the spring. Higher rates of organic arsenicals were required to destroy topgrowth of johnsongrass in the spring and fall than during the summer. DSMA applications at 4 and 6-week intervals were more effective than applications at 8-week intervals. Six 1b/A of DSMA in 100 gpa of water applied broadcast was as effective as 400 gpa containing 6 lb aihg of DSMA applied as a spot treatment. Removing topgrowth of johnsongrass 4 or 24 hr after treatment did not reduce the effectiveness of DSMA. Combining or alternating organic arsenicals with 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon) reduced the effectiveness of the arsenicals. Susceptible strains were destroyed by five or six applications of DSMA and MSMA while 9 or 10 applications were needed to kill more resistant strains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hamilton, K. C. 1961. Two factors influencing the effectiveness of dalapon applied to clumps of johnsongrass in cotton fields. Res. Prog. Rept. WWCC. pp. 24.Google Scholar
2. Hamilton, K. C. 1964. Response of established clumps of six strains of johnsongrass to repeated applications of dalapon. Res. Prog. Rept. WWCC. pp. 1618.Google Scholar
3. Hamilton, K. C. and Tucker, H. 1964. Response of selected and random plantings of johnsongrass to dalapon. Weeds 12:220222.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E. W. and Thompson, J. T. 1959. A study of the absorption and translocation of several chemicals in johnsongrass, and an evaluation of their effectiveness for its control under field conditions. Weeds 7:2033.Google Scholar
5. Lucas, R. E. 1964. “Ansar” 184 disodium methylarsonate (DMA) and related compounds as selective johnsongrass herbicides in cotton. Proc. SWC 17:6264. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effect of surfactant concentration on johnsongrass control with dalapon. Weeds 11:8386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. 1966. Toxicity of DSMA to johnsongrass. Weeds 14:191194.Google Scholar
8. Rumburg, C. B., Engel, R. E., and Meggitt, W. F. 1960. Effect of temperature on the herbicidal activity and translocation of arsenicals. Weeds 8:582588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sckerl, M. M. and Frans, R. E. 1967. Preliminary studies on absorption and translocation of C14-methanearsonates in johnsongrass. Proc. SWC 20:387. (Abstr.) Google Scholar