Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:43:36.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocal Yield Analysis of Red Rice (Oryza sativa) Competition in Cultivated Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dan J. Pantone  and
John B. Baker
Dan J. Pantone
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
John B. Baker
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four years of field experiments were used to assess the competitive ability of red rice, a weedy variety of rice, and ‘Mars’, a cultivar of rice. Red rice was the dominant competitor each of the 4 yr, and an average of one red rice plant reduced Mars grain yield per plant equal to the effect of four Mars plants. Intervarietal competition was more important than intravarietal competition for Mars, whereas the reverse was true for red rice. The product of the coefficients for intravarietal competition did not significantly exceed the product of the coefficients for intervarietal competition, indicating that the two varieties were competing for the same resources. Using the reciprocal yield model coefficients from 1989, grain yield losses of Mars, due to red rice densities of 4, 16, 25, and 300 plants m−2, were predicted to approximate 13, 37, 48, and 92%, respectively, at a fixed cultivar density of 100 plants m−2.

Keywords

Red rice, Oryza sativa L. # ORYSArice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Mars’Weed biologyinterferenceinverse linear modelORYSA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 42 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adair, C. R. 1973. Introduction. Pages 1–5 in Rice in the United States: Varieties and Production. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Begon, M. and Mortimer, M. 1981. Population ecology, a unified study of animals and plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London. 200 pp.Google Scholar
3. Connolly, J. 1986. On difficulties with replacement series methodology in mixture experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Craigmiles, J. P. 1978. Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin, E. F., ed. Red rice: Research and Control. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B. 1270.Google Scholar
5. Diarra, A. 1984. Red rice biology, interference and control in rice (Oryza sativa). Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. 128 pp.Google Scholar
6. Diana, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 33:644–649.Google Scholar
7. Draper, N. and Smith, H. 1981. Pages 108–116 in Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
8. Geng, S., Li, B., and Lin, D. 1986. Variances of some commonly used transformations and combinations of variables for use in computing LSD and other test statistics. Agron. Progr. Rep. No. 188, Univ. California, Davis. 8 pp.Google Scholar
9. Harper, J. L. 1977. Pages 255–267 in Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
10. Hoagland, R. E. and Paul, R. V. 1978. A comparative SEM study of red rice and several commercial rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. Weed Sci. 26:619–625.Google Scholar
11. Huey, B. A. and Baldwin, F. L. 1978. Red rice control. Pages 19–25 in Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice: Research and Control. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-1270.Google Scholar
12. Jolliffe, P. A. 1988. Evaluating the effects of competitive interference on plant performance. J. Theor. Biol. 130:447–459.Google Scholar
13. Kwon, S. L. 1989. Red rice (Oryza sativa) interference and management in rice. Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. 128 pp.Google Scholar
14. Marshall, D. R. and Jain, S. K. 1969. Interference in pure and mixed populations of Avena fatua and A. barbata . J. Ecol. 57:251–270.Google Scholar
15. Navarro, M. A. 1985. Effect of stand density and composition on competition between red rice and the cultivar Mars under field conditions. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge. 68 pp.Google Scholar
16. Ogawa, H. 1969. Experimental studies on the crowding effect in mixed populations of higher plants. Dep. Agric. Thesis, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan. 98 pp. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
17. Pantone, D. J., Williams, W. A., and Maggenti, A. R. 1989. An alternative approach for evaluating the efficacy of potential biocontrol agents of weeds. 1. Inverse linear model. Weed Sci. 37:771–777.Google Scholar
18. Pulver, E. 1986. Economic damage caused by red rice. Lavoura Arrozeira 39:20–23.Google Scholar
19. Radosevitch, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190–198.Google Scholar
20. Rejmanek, M., Robinson, G. R., and Rejmankova, E. 1989. Weed-crop competition: Experimental designs and models for data analysis. Weed Sci. 37:276–284.Google Scholar
21. Rice, K. J. and Menke, J. W. 1985. Competitive reversals and environment dependent resource partitioning in Erodium . Oecologia 67:430–434.Google Scholar
22. SAS Institute. 1985. Pages 433–506 and 655–709 in SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 ed. SAS Inst, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
23. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Weeds of major economic importance in rice and yield losses due to weed competition. Pages 19–36 in Proc. of the Conf. on Weed Control in Rice. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
25. Spitters, C.J.T. 1983. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 31:1–11.Google Scholar
26. Sonnier, E. A. 1969. Red rice studies. Louisiana Rice Exp. Stn. Annu. Progr. Rep. 61:27–42. Crowley, LA.Google Scholar
27. Sonnier, E. A. 1970. Red rice studies. Louisiana Rice Exp. Stn. Annu. Progr. Rep. 62:29–44. Crowley, LA.Google Scholar
28. Sonnier, E. A. 1971. Red rice studies. Louisiana Rice Exp. Stn. Annu. Progr. Rep. 63:33–44. Crowley, LA.Google Scholar
29. Wonnacott, R. J. and Wonnacott, T. H. 1979. Econometrics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 580 pp.Google Scholar