Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:08:53.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocal Common Garden Studies of the Germination of Seeds of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Young  and
Raymond A. Evans
James A. Young
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
Raymond A. Evans
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to compare the influence of production site and seed source on the germination of big sagebrush seeds in relation to incubation temperatures. Seeds of big sagebrush were collected from five plant communities located on the margin of the Carson Desert in western Nevada. Seedlings were grown from the seeds and transplanted back to the sites of collection in reciprocal gardens. Seeds from 1-yr-old gardens were tested for germination at a constant 15 C for three consecutive years. The greater quantity of seeds produced by 2- and 3-yr-old gardens were tested at 55 constant or alternating temperature regimes. Seeds of big sagebrush produced in reciprocal gardens had lower germination than seeds collected from native stands at the same locations. The reduced germination disappeared as the reciprocally transplanted plants grew older and larger, but seeds from these plants did not reach the same levels of germination as those collected from native stands at the same location. Moisture stress and/or freezing temperature conditions during flowering may have directly influenced the quality of seeds produced or interacted with the inherent genotypes of big sagebrush to trigger seed production of variable quality in relation to germination characteristics.

Keywords

Big sagebrushArtemisia tridentata Nutt. ♯3 ARTTRSeed ecologyrange improvementreciprocal gardensARTTR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , May 1989 , pp. 319 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blaisdell, J. P. 1949. Competition between sagebrush seedlings and reseeded grasses. Ecology 30:512–519.Google Scholar
2. Clausen, J., Keck, D. D., and Hiesey, W. M. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst., Wash. Publ. 520. Washington, DC. 452 pp.Google Scholar
3. Clausen, J., Keck, D. D., and Hiesey, W. M. 1948. Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. Carnegie Inst., Wash. Publ. 581. Washington, DC. 129 pp.Google Scholar
4. Evans, R. A., Easi, D. A., Book, D. N., and Young, J. A. 1982. Quadratic response surface analysis of seed-germination trials. Weed Sci. 30:411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Evans, R. A., Holbo, H. R., Eckert, R. E. Jr., and Young, J. A. 1970. Functional environment of downy brome communities in relation to weed control and revegetation. Weed Sci. 18:89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1975. Aerial application of 2,4-D plus picloram for green rabbitbrush control. J. Range Manage. 28:315–318.Google Scholar
7. Frischknecht, N. C. and Bleak, A. T. 1957. Encroachment of big sagebrush on seeded range in northern Nevada. J. Range Manage. 10:165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hall, H. M. and Clements, F. E. 1923. The Phylogenetic Method in Taxonomy. The North American species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex. Carnegie Inst. of Washington. Publ. No. 326. Washington, DC. Page 355.Google Scholar
9. Harniss, R. O. and McDonough, W. T. 1976. Yearly variation in germination in three subspecies of big sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 29:167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Houghton, J. G., Sakamoto, C. M., and Gifford, R. O. 1972. Nevada's Weather and Climate. Special Publ. No. 2. Nevada Bur. of Mines and Geol., Mackay School of Mines, Univ. Nevada, Reno. 78 pp.Google Scholar
11. Hull, A. C. Jr. 1941. Competition between sagebrush and reseeded species on a burned, overgrazed area in southern Idaho. Utah Acad. Sci. Arts and Letters Proc. 18:12.Google Scholar
12. Hull, A. C. Jr. and Vaughn, W. T. 1951. Controlling big sagebrush with 2,4-D and other chemicals. J. Range Manage. 4:158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Johnsen, W. M. 1958. Reinvasion of big sagebrush following chemical control. J. Range Manage. 11:169–172.Google Scholar
14. McArthur, E. D. 1983. Taxonomy, origin and distribution of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) and allies (subgenus tridentatae). Pages 3–13 in Johnson, K. L., ed. Proceedings of the First Utah Shrub Ecology Workshop. College of Natural Resources, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT.Google Scholar
15. McDonough, W. T. and Harniss, R. O. 1974. Effects of temperature and germination on the seeds of three subspecies of big sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 27:204–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. McDonough, W. T. and Harniss, R. O. 1974. Seed dormancy in Artemisia tridentata Nutt. subspecies vaseyana Rydb. Northwest Sci. 48:17–20.Google Scholar
17. Mueggler, W. F. 1956. Is sagebrush seed residual in the soil of burns or is it windborne? Forest Sci., U.S. Dep. Agric., Intermountain For. and Rnage Exp. Stn., Res. Note 35. 10 pp.Google Scholar
18. Palmquist, D. E., Evans, R. A., and Young, J. A. 1988. Comparative analysis of temperature-germination response surfaces. Pages 97–103 in Frasier, G. W. and Evans, R. A., eds. Proceedings of Symposium “Seed and Seedbed Ecology of Rangeland Plants”. Agr. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
19. Pechanec, J. F. 1945. Indicators of downward trend in sagebrush/perennial grass range grazed by sheep in spring and fall. U.S. Dep. Agric., Intermountain For. and Range Exp. Stn., Res. Paper No. 12. 2 pp.Google Scholar
20. Pechanec, J. F., Plummer, P. A., Robertson, J. H., and Hull, A. C. Jr. 1965. Sagebrush control on rangelands. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 277. 40 pp.Google Scholar
21. Sneva, F. A. 1972. Grazing return following sagebrush control in eastern Oregon. J. Range Manage. 25:174–178.Google Scholar
22. Turesson, G. 1922. Genotypical concepts in classification of flowering plants. Hereditas 3:211.Google Scholar
23. West, N. E., ed. 1983. Temperate Deserts and Semideserts. Ecosystems of the World 5. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands. 507 pp.Google Scholar
24. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1982. Temperature profiles for germination of cool season range grasses. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Oakland, CA. 92 pp.Google Scholar
25. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1989. Dispersal and germination of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Weed Sci. 37:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Palmquist, D. E. 1989. Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) seed production. Weed Sci. 37: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar