Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:02:21.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reaction of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) Seedlings to Four Herbicides Applied After Emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Waddington
J. Waddington*
Affiliation:
Res. Sci., Agric. Canada, Melfort, Saskatchewan SOE 1AO Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop. ‘Melrose’) seedlings tolerated at 15:1 commercial formulation of the sodium salts of MCPB {4-[(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy] butyric acid} and MCPA {[(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy] acetic acid} applied at rates up to 2.2 kg/ha in the greenhouse and 3.4 kg/ha in the field. Broadleaf weed control was only fair. Applications of 1.1 kg/ha, 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid] ester caused moderate damage to sainfoin initially, but no reduction in yield. Weed control was fair to good. Higher rates of 2,4-DB caused excessive injury unless a heavy growth of weeds protected the sainfoin from contact with the spray. The use of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid] amine damaged sainfoin severely, although weed control was fair. Nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether) at 3.4 kg/ha caused spotting on sainfoin leaves with no reduction in growth. Initial weed control was good, but sainfoin seedlings did not suppress new weed growth. Herbicide applications made when sainfoin had 1 to 3 leaves provided the best combination of crop tolerance and weed control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , March 1978 , pp. 175 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouchet, F. and Faivre-Dupaigre, R. 1967. Early weed control trials in various leguminous forage crops [in French]. C. R. 4e Conf. Com. Franc. mauv. Herbes (COLUMA) 311–322.Google Scholar
2. Carleton, A. E., Cooper, C. S., and Wiesner, L. E. 1968. Effect of seed pod and temperature on speed of germination and seedling elongation of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop.). Agron. J. 60:81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Guide to Farm Practice in Saskatchewan. 1975. Edited and published by the Univ. of Saskatchewan. 176 pp.Google Scholar
4. Hanna, M. R., Cooke, D. A., and Goplen, B. P. 1970. Melrose Sainfoin. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50:750–751.Google Scholar
5. Robinson, D. H. 1947. Leguminous Forage Plants, 2nd ed. Edward Arnold and Co., London. 119 pp.Google Scholar
6. Stewart, V. R. 1968. Chemical weed control in Sainfoin. Pages 55–62 in Cooper, C. S. and Carleton, A. E., eds. Sainfoin Symposium at Montana State University. Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 627.Google Scholar
7. Zemanek, J., Zvara, J., and Suchanek, A. 1962. The results of field tests with chemical weed killers in forage legumes [in Czech, English summary]. Rostl. Vyroba 35:521–540.Google Scholar