Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:56:25.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proving Allelopathy in Crop–Weed Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen O. Duke
Stephen O. Duke*
Affiliation:
Natural Product Utilization Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, University, MS 38677. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article is written to provide some directions on how to determine if a plant species might influence its neighboring plants by allelopathy. There is insufficient space for detailed instructions for individual experiments, so I will provide references for different general approaches and opinions on common pitfalls of those who have worked in this research area.

Keywords

Allelochemicalallelopathybioassaycompetitioninterferencesoil effects
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue SP1: Special Issue: Research Methods in Weed Science , February 2015 , pp. 121 - 132
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons license is included and the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

References

Literature Cited

Batish, DR, Kaur, S, Singh, HP, Kohli, RK (2009) Nature of interference potential of leaf debris of Ageratum conyzoides. Plant Growth Regul 57:137–144Google Scholar
Belz, RG, Cedergreen, N, Sorensen, H (2008) Hormesis in mixtures—can it be predicted? Sci Total Environ 40:77–87Google Scholar
Belz, RG, Hurle, K, Duke, SO (2005) Dose–response—a challenge for allelopathy? Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med 3:173–211Google Scholar
Belz, RG, Velini, ED, Duke, SO (2007) Dose/response relationships in allelopathy research., Pages 3–29, in Fujii, Y, Hiradate, S, eds. Allelopathy: New Concepts and Methodology. Enfield, NHScience PublishersGoogle Scholar
Bertin, C, Harmon, R, Akaogi, M, Weidenhamer, JD, Weston, LA (2009) Assessment of the phytotoxic potential of m-tyrosine in laboratory soil bioassays. J Chem Ecol 35:1288–1294Google Scholar
Bertin, C, Weston, LA, Huang, T, Jander, G, Owens, T, Meinwald, J, Schroeder, FC (2007) Grass roots chemistry: meta-tyrosine, and herbicidal nonprotein amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:16964–16969Google Scholar
Blum, U (2011) Plant–Plant Allelopathic Interactions. Phenolic Acids, Cover Crops and Weed Emergence. New YorkSpringer. 200 pGoogle Scholar
Cerdeira, AL, Cantrell, CL, Dayan, FE, Byrd, JD, Duke, SO (2012) Tabanone, a new phytotoxic constituent of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Weed Sci 60:212–218Google Scholar
Chou, CH, Muller, CH (1972) Allelopathic mechanisms of Arctostaphylos glandulosa var. zacaensis. Am Midl Nat 88:324–347Google Scholar
Davis, EF (1928) The toxic principle of Juglans nigra as identified with synthetic juglone and its toxic effects on tomato and alfalfa plants. Am J Bot 15:620Google Scholar
Dayan, FE (2006) Factors modulating the levels of the allelochemical sorgoleone in Sorghum bicolor. Planta 224:339–346Google Scholar
Dayan, FE, Duke, SO (2009) Biological activity of allelochemicals., Pages 361–384, in Osbourn, A, Lanzotti, V, eds. Plant-Derived Natural Products—Synthesis, Function and Application. Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringerGoogle Scholar
Dayan, FE, Howell, J, Weidenhamer, JD (2009) Dynamic root exudation of sorgoleone and its in planta mechanism of action. J Exp Bot 60:2107–2117Google Scholar
Dayan, FE, Rimando, AM, Pan, Z, Baerson, SR, Gimsing, A-L, Duke, SO (2010) Molecules of interest: sorgoleone. Phytochemistry 71:1032–1039Google Scholar
Dayan, FE, Romagni, JG, Duke, SO (2000) Investigating the mode of action of natural phytotoxins. J Chem Ecol 26:2079–2094Google Scholar
Devine, MD, Duke, SO, Fedtke, C (1993) Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJPrentice Hall. 441 pGoogle Scholar
Dietz, H, Steinlein, T, Winterhalter, P, Ullman, I (1996) Role of allelopathy as a possible factor associated with the rising dominance of Bunias orientalis L. (Brassicaceae) in some native plant assemblages. J Chem Ecol 22:1797–1811Google Scholar
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265Google Scholar
Dornbos, DL, Spencer, GF (1990) Natural products phytotoxicity: a bioassay suitable for small quantities of slightly water-soluble compounds. J Chem Ecol 16:339–352Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Bajsa, J, Pan, Z (2013) Omics methods for probing the mode of action of natural and synthetic phytotoxins. J Chem Ecol 39:333–347Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Blair, AC, Dayan, FE, Johnson, RD, Meepagala, KM, Cook, D, Bajsa, J (2009) Is (–)-catechin a novel weapon of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe)? J Chem Ecol 35:141–153Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Vaughn, KC, Croom, EM, ElSohly, HN (1987) Artemisinin, constituent of annual wormwood (Artemisia annua), is a selective phytotoxin. Weed Sci 35:499–505Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Williams, RD, Markhart, AH (1983) Interaction of moisture stress and three phenolic acids on lettuce seed germination. Ann Bot 52:923–926Google Scholar
Einhellig, FA, Leather, GR, Hobbs, LL (1985) Use of Lemna minor L. as a bioassay in allelopathy. J Chem Ecol 11:65–72Google Scholar
Einhellig, FA, Schon, MK, Rasmussen, JA (1983) Synergistic effects of four cinnamic acid compounds on grain sorghum. J Plant Growth Reg 1:251–258Google Scholar
Fujii, Y, Pariasca, D, Shibuya, T, Yasuda, T, Kahn, B, Waller, GR (2007) Plant-box method: a specific biosassay to evaluate allelopathy through root exudates., Pages 39–56, in Fujii, Y, Hiradate, S, eds. Allelopathy: New Concepts and Methodology. Enfield, NHScience PublishersGoogle Scholar
Hagan, DL, Jose, S, Lin, C-H (2013) Allelopathic exudates of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica): implications for the performance of native pine savanna plant species in the southeastern US. J Chem Ecol 39:312–322Google Scholar
Hilt, S, Beutler, E, Bauer, N (2012) Comparison of methods to detect allelopathic effect of submerged macrophytes on green algae. J Phycol 48:40–44Google Scholar
Hiradate, S (2006) Isolation strategies for finding bioactive compounds: specific activity vs. total activity. Am Chem Soc Symp Ser 927:113–126Google Scholar
Hiradate, S, Ohse, K, Furubayashi, A, Fujii, Y (2010) Quantitative evaluation of allelopathic potentials in soils: total activity approach. Weed Sci 58:258–264Google Scholar
Hoffman, DW, Lavy, TL (1978) Plant competition for atrazine. Weed Sci 26:94–99Google Scholar
Inderjit, , Callaway, RM, Vivanco, JM (2006) Can plant biochemistry contribute to understanding of invasion ecology?. Trends Plant Sci 11:574–580Google Scholar
Inderjit, , Streibig, JC (2002) Joint action of phenolic acid mixtures and its significance in allelopathy research. Physiol Plant 114:422–428Google Scholar
Jessing, K, Cedergreen, N, Mayer, P, Libous-Bailey, L, Strobel, BW, Rimando, A, Duke, SO (2013) Loss of artemisinin produced by Artemisia annual L. to the soil environment. Ind Crops Prod 43:132–140Google Scholar
Jessing, K, Duke, SO, Cedergreen, N (2014) What is the ecological relevance of artemisinin production in Artemisia annua. J Chem Ecol 40:100–117Google Scholar
Keech, O, Carcaillet, C, Nilsson, M-C (2005) Adsorption of allelopathic compounds by wood-derived charcoal: the role of wood porosity. Plant and Soil 272:291–300Google Scholar
Klayman, DL (1985) Qinghaosu (artemisinin): an antimalarial drug from China. Science 228:1049–1055Google Scholar
Knudsen, CG, Lee, DL, Michaely, WJ, Chin, H-L, Nguyen, NH, Rusay, J, Cromartie, TH, Gray, R, Lake, BH, Fraser, M, Cartwright, D (2000) Discovery of the triketone class of HPPD-inhibiting herbicides and their relationship to naturally occurring β-triketones., Pages 101–111, in Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Allelopathy in Ecological and Agriculture ForestryGoogle Scholar
Kong, C, Xu, X, Zhou, B, Hu, F, Zhang, C, Zhang, M (2004) Two compounds from allelopathic rice accession and their inhibitory activity on weeds and fungal pathogens. Phytochemistry 65:1123–1128Google Scholar
Lau, JA, Puliafico, KP, Kopshever, JA, Steltzer, H, Jarvis, EP, Schwarzländer, M, Strauss, SY, Hufbauer, RA (2008) Inference of allelopathy is complicated by effects of activated charcoal on plant growth. New Phytol 178:412–423Google Scholar
Loi, RX, Solar, MC, Weidenhamer, JD (2008) Solid-phase microextraction method for in vivo measurement of allelochemical uptake. J Chem Ecol 34:70–75Google Scholar
Macías, FA, Marín, D, Oliveros-Bastidas, A, Castellano, D, Simonet, AM, Molinillo, J. M. G. (2005) Structure-activity relationships (SAR) studies of benzoxazinones, their degradation products and analogues, phytotoxicity on standard target species (STS). J Agric Food Chem 53:538–548Google Scholar
Mattice, R, Lavy, T, Skulman, B, Dilday, R (1998) Searching for allelochemicals in rice that control ducksalad., Pages 81–98, in Olofsdotter, M, ed. Allelopathy in Rice: Proceedings of the Workshop on Allelopathy in Rice, November 25–27, 1996. Manila, The PhilippinesInternational Rice Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
Meepagala, KM, Sturtz, G, Wedge, DE, Schrader, KK, Duke, SO (2005) Phytotoxic and antifungal compounds from two Apiaceae species, Lomatium californicum and Ligusticum hultenii, rich souces of Z-ligustilide and apiol, respectively. J Chem Ecol 31:1567–1578Google Scholar
Michel, A, Johnson, RD, Duke, SO, Scheffler, BE (2004) Dose–response relationships between herbicides with different modes of action and growth of Lemna paucicostata—an improved ecotoxicological method. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1074–1079Google Scholar
Mohney, BK, Matz, T, La Moreaux, J, Wilcox, DS, Gimsing, AL, Mayer, P, Weidenhamer, JD (2009) In situ silicone tube microextraction: a new method for undisturbed sampling of root-exuded thiophenes from marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) in soil. J Chem Ecol 35:1279–1287Google Scholar
Nilsson, MC (1994) Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup. Oecologia 98:1–7Google Scholar
Rice, EL (1984) Allelopathy. 2nd ed. Orlando, FLAcademic Press. 422 pGoogle Scholar
Ridenour, WM, Callaway, RM (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 126:444–450Google Scholar
Rimando, AM, Duke, SO (2003) Studies on rice allelochemicals., Pages 221–244, in Smith, CW, Dilday, RH, eds. Rice: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Hoboken, NJWileyGoogle Scholar
Silva, F. M. L., Donega, MA, Cerdeira, AL, Cantrell, CL, Shea, K, Duke, SO (2014) Roots of the invasive species Carduus nutans L. and C. acanthoides L. produce the phytotoxin aplotaxene, a possible allelochemical. J Chem Ecol 40:276–284Google Scholar
Stickney, JA, Hoy, PR (1881) Toxic action of black walnut. Trans Wis State Hort Soc 11:166–167Google Scholar
Streibig, JD, Dayan, FE, Rimando, AM, Duke, SO (1999) Joint action of natural and synthetic photosystem II inhibitors. Pestic Sci 55:137–146Google Scholar
Swain, D, Paroha, S, Singh, M, Subudhi, HN (2012) Evaluations of allelopathic effect of Echinocloa colona weed on rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Vandana’). J Environ Biol 33:881–889Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Nkoa, R, Blackshaw, RE (2015) Experimental methods for crop–weed competition studies. Weed Sci 63:2–11Google Scholar
Tharayil, N, Bhowmik, PC, Xing, B (2006) Preferential sorption of phenolic phytotoxins to soil: implications for altering the availability of allelochemicals. J Agric Food Chem 54:3033–3040Google Scholar
Thijs, H, Shann, JR, Weidenhamer, JD (1994) The effect of phytotoxins on competitive outcome in a model system. Ecology 75:1959–1964Google Scholar
Vaughn, KC, Duke, SO (1984) Function of polyphenol oxidase in higher plants. Physiol Plant 60:106–112Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, JD (2005) Biomimetic measurement of allelochemical dynamics in the rhizophere. J Chem Ecol 31:221–236Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, JD (2006) Distinguishing allelopathy from resource competition: the role of density., Pages 85–103, in Reigosa, MJ, Pedrol, N, González, L, eds. Allelopathy: A Physiological Process with Ecological Implications. Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringerGoogle Scholar
Weidenhamer, JD, Hartnett, DC, Romeo, JT (1989) Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J Appl Ecol 26:613–614Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, JD, Morton, TC, Romeo, JT (1987) Solution volume and seed number: Often overlooked factors in allelopathic bioassays. J Chem Ecol 13:1481–1491Google Scholar
Weston, LA, Alsaadawi, IS, Baerson, SR (2013) Sorghum allelopathy—from ecosystem to molecule. J Chem Ecol 39:142–153Google Scholar
Wu, H, Pratley, J, Lemerle, D, Haig, T (2000) Laboratory screening for allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) accessions against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Aust J Agric Res 55:259–266Google Scholar
Wurst, S, Vender, V, Rillig, MC (2010) Testing for allelopathic effects in plant competition: does activated carbon disrupt plant symbioses? Plant Ecol 211:19–26Google Scholar
Xu, M, Galhano, R, Wiemann, P, Bueno, E, Tiernan, M, Wu, W, Chung, I-M, Gershenzon, J, Tudzynski, B, Sesma, A, Peters, RJ (2012) Genetic evidence for natural product-mediated plant–plant allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol 193:570–575Google Scholar