Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:06:52.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicted Soybean Yield Loss As Affected by Emergence Time of Mixed-Species Weed Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark R. Jeschke ,
David E. Stoltenberg ,
George O. Kegode ,
Christy L. Sprague ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Shawn M. Hock  and
Gregg A. Johnson
Mark R. Jeschke
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
David E. Stoltenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
George O. Kegode
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Stevan Z. Knezevic
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, Concord, NE 68728-2828
Shawn M. Hock
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, Concord, NE 68728-2828
Gregg A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Southern Research and Outreach Center, Waseca, MN 56093
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potential crop yield loss due to early-season weed competition is an important risk associated with postemergence weed management programs. WeedSOFT is a weed management decision support system that has the potential to greatly reduce such risk. Previous research has shown that weed emergence time can greatly affect the accuracy of corn yield loss predictions by WeedSOFT, but our understanding of its predictive accuracy for soybean yield loss as affected by weed emergence time is limited. We conducted experiments at several sites across the Midwestern United States to assess accuracy of WeedSOFT predictions of soybean yield loss associated with mixed-species weed communities established at emergence (VE), cotyledon (VC), first-node (V1), or third-node (V3) soybean. Weed communities across research sites consisted mostly of annual grass species and moderately competitive annual broadleaf species. Soybean yield loss occurred in seven of nine site-years for weed communities established at VE soybean, four site-years for weed communities established at VC soybean, and one site-year for weed communities established at V1 soybean. No soybean yield loss was associated with weed communities established at the V3 stage. Nonlinear regression analyses of predicted and observed soybean yield data pooled over site-years showed that predicted yields were less than observed yields at all soybean growth stages, indicating overestimation of soybean yield loss. Pearson correlation analyses indicated that yield loss functions overestimated the competitive ability of high densities of giant and yellow foxtail with soybean, indicating that adjustments to competitive index values or yield loss function parameters for these species may improve soybean yield loss prediction accuracy and increase the usefulness of WeedSOFT as a weed management decision support system.

Keywords

Giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm., SETFAyellow foxtail, Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roemer &J.A. Schultes, SETLUcorn, Zea mays Lsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrBioeconomic modelcompetitive indexdecision support systemintegrated weed managementWeedSOFT
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 416 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7300 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131-1004.

current address: Department of Agriculture, 800 University Drive, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO 64468-6001.

References

Literature Cited

Crawley, M. J. 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus. West Sussex, England John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 305–322.Google Scholar
Fickett, N. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Boerboom, C. M., and Hammond, C. M. 2009. Estimated economic losses from early weed competition in Wisconsin corn and soybean fields. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 64:93.Google Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., Harrison, S. K., Sprankle, P. L., Probst, N. J., Bauman, T. T., Bugg, W., Curran, W. S., Currie, R. S., Harvey, R. G., Johnson, W. G., Kells, J. J., Owen, M. D. K., Regehr, D. L., Slack, C. H., Spaur, M., Sprague, C. L., VanGessel, M., and Young, B. G. 2003. Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol. 17:821–828.Google Scholar
Hock, S. M., Knezevic, S. Z., Johnson, W. G., Sprague, C., and Martin, A. R. 2007. WeedSOFT: effects of corn-row spacing for predicting herbicide efficacy on selected weed species. Weed Technol. 21:219–224.Google Scholar
Hock, S. M., Knezevic, S. Z., Martin, A. R., and Lindquist, J. L. 2006a. Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices. Weed Sci. 54:38–46.Google Scholar
Hock, S. M., Knezevic, S. Z., Martin, A. R., and Lindquist, J. L. 2006b. Performance of WeedSOFT for predicting soybean yield loss. Weed Technol. 20:478–484.Google Scholar
Jeschke, M. R., Stoltenberg, D. E., Kegode, G. O., Dille, J. A., and Johnson, G. A. 2009. Weed community emergence time affects accuracy of predicted corn yield loss by WeedSOFT. Weed Technol. 23:477–485.Google Scholar
Kruger, G. R., Johnson, W. G., and Weller, S. C., et al. 2009. U.S. grower views on problematic weeds and changes in weed pressure in glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean cropping systems. Weed Technol. 23:162–166.Google Scholar
Moeching, M. J., Boerboom, C. M., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Binning, L. K. 2003. Growth interactions in communities of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), and corn. Weed Sci. 51:363–370.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:35–42.Google Scholar
Myers, M. W., Curran, W. S., VanGessel, M. J., Majek, B. A., Scott, B. A., Mortensen, D. A., Calvin, D. D., Karsten, H. D., and Roth, G. W. 2005. The effect of weed density and application timing of weed control and corn grain yield. Weed Technol. 19:102–107.Google Scholar
Neeser, C., Dille, J. A., Krishman, G., Mortensen, D. A., Rawlinson, J. T., Martin, A. R., and Bills, L. B. 2004. WeedSOFT®: a weed management decision support system. Weed Sci. 52:115–122.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus. New York Springer. 530 p.Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1990. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models. Statistics, textbooks and monographs, Vol. 107, 241 p. New York Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1997a. How a corn plant develops. Special Rep. 48. Ames, IA Iowa State University. 22 p.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., Thompson, H. E., and Benson, G. O. 1997b. How a soybean plant develops. Special Rep. 53. Ames, IA Iowa State University. 20 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. A., Johnson, W. G., and Mortensen, D. A., et al. 2005. Evaluation of corn (Zea mays L.) yield-loss estimations by WeedSOFT® in the north central region. Weed Technol. 19:1056–1064.Google Scholar