Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:34:01.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential for gene transfer between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. S. Zemetra ,
J. Hansen  and
C. A. Mallory-Smith
J. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
C. A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jointed goatgrass is a major weed in the wheat-producing areas of the western U.S. It shares the D genome with wheat, and interspecific hybrids between the two species occur in the field. The objective of this research was to determine if wheat X jointed goatgrass hybrids could serve to transfer genes from wheat to jointed goatgrass. A backcrossing program was initiated in the greenhouse between wheat X jointed goatgrass hybrids and either jointed goatgrass or wheat to determine the potential for seed set and the restoration of self-fertility. Seed was set by backcrossing with either species as the recurrent parent. Female fertility increased from 2% in the hybrid to 37% in the BC2 plants with jointed goatgrass as the recurrent parent. Partial self-fertility was restored in the second backcross (BC2) generation using jointed goatgrass as the recurrent parent. This indicates that genes could be transferred between wheat and jointed goatgrass after only two backcrosses. The number of bivalents observed in the plants during meiosis appeared to be key to increasing female fertility and self-fertility. Based on the results of this study, it is possible for genes to move from wheat to jointed goatgrass. Any release of a herbicide-resistant wheat should be accompanied by a management plan that would minimize the potential for gene movement between these species.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum L.jointed goatgrass, Aegilops cylindrica Ces., Host AEGCYHerbicide resistancebiological riskAEGCY
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 313 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allan, R. E., Peterson, C. J., Rubenthaler, G. L., Line, R. F., and Roberts, D. E. 1989. Registration of ‘Madsen’ wheat. Crop Sci. 26: 1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, D. M. and Rieseberg, L. H. 1994. Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 655–660.Google Scholar
Arriola, P. E. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1996. Crop-to weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor . Am. J. Bot. 83: 1153–1160.Google Scholar
Chen, Q., Jahier, J., and Cauderon, Y. 1990. Intergeneric hybrids between Triticum aestivum and three crested wheatgrasses: Agropyron mongolicum, Amichnoi, and A. desertorum . Genome 33: 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, S. 1996. Jointed goatgrass—an overview of the problem. Pages 1–2 in Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Jointed Goatgrass Conference, Pocatello, ID. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Doebley, J. 1990. Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species. BioScience 40: 443–448.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 53: 3–17.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C. and Hoffman, C. A. 1990. Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. BioScience 40: 438–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, T. R. 1988. Introduction of chromosome changes by a chromosome of Aegilops cylindrica L. in common wheat. J. Hered. 79: 366–370.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. M. and Newell, N. 1985. Genetic engineering of plants for herbicide resistance: status and prospects. Pages 47–53 in Halverson, H. O., Pramer, D., and Rogul, M., eds. Engineered Organisms in the Environment: Scientific Issues. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology.Google Scholar
Heiser, C. B. 1973. Introgression re-examined. Bot. Rev. 39: 347–365.Google Scholar
Kimber, G. and Sears, E. R. 1987. Evolution in the genus Triticum and the origin of cultivated wheat. Pages 154–164 in Heyne, E. G., ed. Wheat and Wheat Improvement. Agronomy Monograph No. 13. Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Klinger, T., Elam, D. R., and Ellstrand, N. C. 1991. Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop—weed mating. Conserv. Biol. 5: 531–535.Google Scholar
Ladizinsky, G. 1985. Founder effect in crop—plant evolution. Econ. Bot. 39: 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Hansen, J., and Zemetra, R. S. 1996. Gene transfer between wheat and Aegilops cylindrica. Pages 441–445 in Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: Dapartment of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology.Google Scholar
Metz, P.L.J., Jacobsen, E., Nap, J. P., Perira, A., and Stiekema, W. J. 1997. The impact of biosafety of the phosphinothricine-tolerance transgene in the inter-specific Bnapa × B. napus hybrids and their successive backcrosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 442–450.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K. E., Smith, W. A., Starrett, M. A., Schaffer, T. J., and Singh, B. J. 1992. Tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in wheat. Plant Physiol. 100: 882–886.Google Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H., Linder, C. R., and Seiler, G. J. 1995. Chromosome and genic barriers to introgression in Helianthus. Genetics 141: 1163–1171.Google Scholar
Small, E. 1984. Hybridization in the domesticated-weed-wild complex. Pages 195–210 in Grant, W. F., ed. Plant Biosystematics. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitton, J., Wolf, D. E., Arias, D. M., Snow, A. A., and Reiseberg, L. H. 1997. The persistence of cultivar alleles in wild populations of sunflowers five generations after hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. D. 1990. Gene flow in squash species. BioScience 40: 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar