Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:48:28.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Linda Hall ,
Keith Topinka ,
John Huffman ,
Lesley Davis  and
Allen Good
Keith Topinka
Affiliation:
Agronomy Unit, Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development, 6903 116 Street, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6H 5Z2
John Huffman
Affiliation:
Regional Advisory Services, Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development, 1001 Provincial Building, 10320 99 Street, Grand Prairie, AB, Canada T8V 6J4
Lesley Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9
Allen Good
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field in which Brassica napus volunteers were not controlled by several applications of glyphosate was investigated in 1998. This field had been planted with glufosinate-resistant and imidazolinone-resistant B. napus in 1997 and was adjacent to a field that had grown glyphosate-resistant B. napus. Mature volunteer B. napus were collected on a 50- by 100-m grid in the field. Progeny from 34 volunteers were sprayed with glyphosate at 440 g ae ha−1, and the survivors were sprayed with either glufosinate or imazethapyr at 400 or 50 g ai ha−1, respectively. Where seed numbers permitted (14 volunteers), seedlings were also sprayed sequentially with glyphosate, glufosinate, and imazethapyr, at 440 g ae ha−1, 400 g ai ha−1, and 50 g ai ha−1, respectively. In total, 15 volunteers had progeny that were between 66 and 82% resistant to glyphosate, consistent with the predicted 3:1 resistant : susceptible ratio. Volunteer B. napus plants with glyphosate-resistant seedlings were most common close to the putative pollen source; however, a plant with glyphosate-resistant progeny was collected 500 m from the adjacent field edge. Seedlings from all nine volunteers collected from the glufosinate-resistant area showed multiple resistance to glyphosate and glufosinate, whereas seedlings from 10 of 20 volunteers collected from the imidazolinone-resistant area showed resistance to imazethapyr and glyphosate. DNA extraction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of seedlings confirmed that mature B. napus volunteers were hybrids resulting from pollen transfer rather than inadvertent seed movement between fields. Two seedlings from the 924 screened were resistant to all three herbicides. Progeny from these self-pollinated individuals were resistant to glyphosate and glufosinate at the predicted 3:1 resistant : susceptible ratio and resistant to imazethapyr at the predicted 15:1 resistant : susceptible ratio. Sequential crossing of three herbicide-resistant varieties is the most likely explanation for the observed multiple herbicide resistance. Integrated management techniques, including suitable crop and herbicide rotations, herbicide mixtures, and nonchemical controls should be used to reduce the incidence and negative effect of B. napus volunteers with multiple herbicide resistance.

Keywords

Brassica napus L., oil-seed rapeALS, acetolactate synthaseEPSP, enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphateglufosinateglyphosateimazethapyrPollen transferherbicide tolerancevolunteer canolaoilseed rape
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , December 2000 , pp. 688 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barry, G., Kishore, G., Padgette, S., et al. 1992. Inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis: strategies for imparting glyphosate tolerance to crop plants. Pages 139–145 In Singh, B. J., Flores, H. E., and Shannon, J. C., eds. Current Topics in Plant Physiology, an American Society of Plant Physiologists Series; Biosynthesis and Molecular Regulation of Amino Acids in Plants. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 1995a. Decision document DD95-01: Determination of Environmental Safety of AgrEvo Canada Inc.'s Glufosinate Ammonium-Tolerant Canola. http://www.cfia-acia.agr.ca/english/plaveg/pbo/old/dd9501e.shtml. Accessed March 13, 2000.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 1995b. Decision document DD95-03: Determination of Environmental Safety of Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc.'s Imidazolinone-Tolerant Canola. http://www.cfiaacia.agr.ca/english/plaveg/pbo/old/dd9503e.shtml. Accessed March 13, 2000.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 1996. Decision document: DD96-07: Determination of Environmental Safety of Monsanto Canada Inc.'s Roundup® Herbicide-Tolerant Brassica napus Canola Line GT73. http://www.cfia-acia.agr.ca/english/plaveg/pbo/old/dd9502e.shtml. Accessed March 13, 2000.Google Scholar
Chèvre, A. M., Eber, F., Baranger, A., Kerlan, M. C., Barret, P., Festoc, G., Vallée, P., and Renard, M. 1996. Interspecific gene flow as a component of risk assessment for transgenic Brassicas . Acta Hortic. 407:169–179.Google Scholar
De Block, M., Botterman, J., Vandewiele, M., et al. 1987. Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme. EMBO J. 6 (9): 2513–2518.Google Scholar
Downey, R. K. 1999. Risk assessment of out-crossing of transgenic Brassica, with focus on B. rapa and B. napus . In Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P., Morris, W., and Jacobi, C. M. 1994. Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3:15–21.Google Scholar
Keeler, K. H., Turner, C. E., and Bolick, M. R. 1996. Movement of crop transgenes into wild plants. Pages 303–330 In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. 1997. Performance of Glufosinate-Tolerant Susceptible Near-Isogenic Lines of Brassica napus L. . University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. 117 p.Google Scholar
Lefol, E., Danielou, V., and Darmency, H. 1996. Predicting hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild mustard. Field Crops Res. 45:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefol, E., Séguin-Swartz, G., and Downey, R. K. 1997. Sexual hybridization in crosses of cultivated Brassica species with Erucastrum gallicum and Raphanus raphanistrum: potential for gene introgression. Euphytica 95:127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Re, D. B., Barry, G. F., Eichholtz, D. E., Dalannay, X., Fuchs, R. L., Kishore, G. M., and Fraley, R. T. 1992. New weed control opportunities: development of soybeans with a Roundup Ready® gene. Pages 53–84 In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rakow, G. and Woods, D. 1987. Out-crossing in rape and mustard under Saskatchewan prairie conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:147–151.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Bascomb, N. F., and Smith, W. 1996. Imidazolinone-resistant crops: selection, characterization, and management. Pages 143–157 In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, A. G., Parkin, I.A.P., Keith, D. J., and Lydiate, D. J. 1995. Frequent nonreciprocal translocation in the amphidiploid genome of oilseed rape (Brassia napus). Genome 38:1112–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillito, D., Parkin, I.A.P., Mayerhofer, R., Lydiate, D. J., and Good, A. G. 2000. Arabidopsis thaliana, a source of candidate disease resistance genes for Brassica napus . Genome. 43:452–460.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R., Burn, D., and Crawford, J. W. 1997. A model for the impact of herbicide tolerance on the performance of oilseed rape as a volunteer weed. Ann. Appl. Biol. 131:315–338.Google Scholar
Stringam, G. R. and Downey, R. K. 1978. Effectiveness of isolation distance in turnip rape. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:427–434.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., Frick, B. L., and Hall, L. M. 1998. Alberta Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops in 1997. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 98-2. 283 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. A. and Leeson, J. Y. 2000. Persistence of volunteer wheat and canola using weed survey data. Page 94 in Proceeding of the 1999 Expert Committee on Weeds, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Timmons, A. M., Charters, J. M., Crawford, J. W., et al. 1996. Risks from transgenic crops. Nature 380:487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlleben, W., Arnold, W., Broer, I., Hillemann, D. Strauch, E., and Pühler, A. 1988. Nucleotide sequence of the phosphinothricin N-acetyl-transferace gene from Streptomyces viridonchromogenes Tü494 and its expression in Nicotiana tabacum . Gene 70:25–37.Google Scholar