Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zh294 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T02:39:34.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin M. Williams II
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The critical period for weed control (CPWC) identifies the phase of the crop growth cycle when weed interference results in unacceptable yield losses; however, the effect of planting date on CPWC is not well understood. Field studies were conducted in 2004 and 2005 at Urbana, IL, to determine CPWC in sweet corn for early May (EARLY) and late-June (LATE) planting dates. A quantitative series of treatments of both increasing duration of interference and length of weed-free period were imposed within each planting-date main plot. The beginning and end of the CPWC, based on 5% loss of marketable ear mass, was determined by fitting logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing increasing duration of weed interference and weed-free periods, respectively. Weed interference stressed the crop more quickly and to a greater extent in EARLY, relative to LATE. At a 5% yield-loss level, duration of weed interference for 160 and 662 growing-degree days (GDD) from crop emergence marked the beginning of the CPWC for EARLY and LATE, respectively. When maintained weed-free for 320 and 134 GDD, weeds emerging later caused yield losses of less than 5% for EARLY and LATE, respectively. Weed densities exceeded 85 plants m−2 for the duration of the experiments and predominant species included barnyardgrass, common lambsquarters, common purslane, redroot pigweed, and velvetleaf. Weed canopy height and total aboveground weed biomass were 300% and 500% higher, respectively, for EARLY compared with LATE. Interactions between planting date and CPWC indicate the need to consider planting date in the optimization of integrated weed management systems for sweet corn. In this study, weed management in mid-June–planted sweet corn could have been less intensive than early May–planted corn, reducing herbicide use and risk of herbicide carryover to sensitive rotation crops.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCGcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. POROLredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTHsweet corn, Zea mays L. ‘GH0937’Competitioncritical weed-free periodintegrated weed managementyield loss
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 928 - 933
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Azanza, F., Bar-Zur, A., and Juvik, J. A. 1996. Variation in sweet corn kernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality. Euphytica. 87:7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Gunsolus, J. L. 1996. Effect of date of preplant tillage and planting on weed populations and mechanical weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, E. and Liebman, M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: the effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil. 167:227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., and Blankenship, E. E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., and Harrison, S. K. 2002. Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergent application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn. Weed Technol. 16:488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, R. L., Dufault, R. J., and Phillips, T. L. 2003. Low-temperature germination response of su, se, and sh 2 sweet corn cultivars. HortTechnol. 13:136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50:773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, A. J., Riha, S. J., and Mohler, C. L. 2004. Mining the record: historical evidence for climatic influences on maize-Abutilon theophrasti competition. Weed Res. 44:439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, R. W., Tumosa, N., and Williams, K. 1981. Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant. Oecologia. 48:371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajcan, I. and Swanton, C. J. 2001. Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res. 71:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Pages 135–157 in Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., Benson, G. O., and Herman, J. C. 2003. How a corn plant develops. Special Report No. 48 (Revised). Ames, IA: Iowa State University of Sciences and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Rushing, G. S. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Influence of planting date on common cocklebur interference in early maturing soybean. Weed Sci. 46:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treat, C. L. and Tracy, W. F. 1994. Endosperm type effects on biomass production and on stalk and root quality in sweet corn. Crop Sci. 34:396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vengris, J., Colby, W. G., and Drake, M. 1955. Plant nutrient competition between weeds and corn. Agron. J. 47:213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Masiunas, J. B. 2006. Functional relationships between giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) interference and sweet corn yield and ear traits. Weed Sci. 54:947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. Pages 109–130 in Weed–Crop Competition: A Review. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar