Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:19:24.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological effect of clopyralid on corn as determined by bioassay and light-scattering spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nataraj N. Vettakkorumakankav ,
Satish Deshpande ,
Terry A. Walsh  and
J. Christopher Hall
Nataraj N. Vettakkorumakankav
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Satish Deshpande
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Terry A. Walsh
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The broadleaf auxinic herbicide clopyralid was applied to three varieties of corn (Pioneer 36B08, Pioneer 3730, and Pioneer 3559) to determine whether it was phytotoxic to this crop. The effects of clopyralid on the growth and development of corn were compared with those induced by the auxinic herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, and fluroxypyr. When compared with the other auxinic herbicides, clopyralid, applied as a foliar spray at the three- and six-leaf stages of development, caused the least damage to all three varieties of corn. Among the auxinic herbicides tested, fluroxypyr and dicamba caused severe damage to the three varieties, whereas picloram and 2,4-D had significant detrimental effects on the growth and development of varieties 36B08 and 3730. Similar results were also obtained when corn seeds were germinated in petri dishes containing increasing concentrations of the auxinic herbicides. In addition to correlating these growth and development effects with auxinic herbicide–induced physiological changes in corn, we compared the effects of clopyralid and dicamba on proton efflux from isolated protoplasts of the three varieties. Results of these biophysical studies are consistent with those from our growth and developmental studies and confirm that clopyralid is least effective in eliciting a response in corn when compared with dicamba. We conclude that clopyralid does not cause the deleterious effects seen with other auxinic herbicides when sprayed under optimal environmental conditions, i.e., high humidity and temperature.

Keywords

Clopyralid2,4-Ddicambafluroxypyrpicloramcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 36B08’, ‘Pioneer 3730’, ‘Pioneer 3559’Auxinic herbicidesphytotoxicity
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 713 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cohen, L. B., Keynes, R. D., and Hillie, B. 1968. Light scattering and bifringence during nerve activity. Nature 218:438–441.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S. and Hall, J. C. 1995. Comparison of flash-induced light-scattering transients and proton efflux from auxinic-herbicide resistant and susceptible wild mustard protoplasts: a possible role for calcium in mediating auxinic herbicide resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1244:69–78.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S. and Hall, J. C. 1996. ATP-dependent auxin- and auxinic herbicide-induced volume changes in isolated protoplast suspensions from Sinapis arvensis L. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 56:26–43.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S. and Hall, J. C. 2000. Auxinic herbicide resistance may be modulated at the auxin-binding site in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.): a light scattering study. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 66:41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. pp. 295–309.Google Scholar
Garab, G.Y.I., Paillotin, G., and Joliot, P. 1979. Flash induced scattering transients in the 10 μs-5 s time range between 450 and 540 nm with Chlorella cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 545:445–453.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C., Bassi, P. K., Spencer, M. S., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. An evaluation of the role of ethylene in herbicidal injury induced by picloram and clopyralid in rapeseed and sunflower plants. Plant Physiol. 79:18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. C. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1988. The absence of a role of absorption, translocation or metabolism in the selectivity of picloram and clopyralid in two plant species. Weed Sci. 36:9–14.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C., Webb, S. R., and Deshpande, S. 1996. An overview of auxinic herbicide resistance: Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) as a case study. Pages 28–43 In Brown, T. M., ed. Molecular Genetics and Evolution of Pesticide Resistance. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, A. L. 1968. Theory of the angular dependence of light scattered by bacteria and similar-sized biological objects. J. Theor. Biol. 18:133–156.Google Scholar
McManus, M., Fischbarg, J., Sun, A., Hebert, S., and Strange, K. 1993. Laser light scattering system for studying cell volume regulation and membrane transport processes. Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Cell Physiol. 34) C562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepnoski, R. A., LaPorta, A., Raccuia-Behling, F., Blonder, G. E., Slusher, R. E., and Kleinfield, D. 1991. Noninvasive detection of changes in membrane potential in cultured neurons by light scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9382–9386.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Hall, J. C. 1997. Mechanism of action of natural auxins and the auxinic herbicides. Pages 111–141 In Roe, R. M., Burton, J. D., and Kuhr, R. J., eds. Herbicide Activity: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar