Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:03:05.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photosynthetic Response of Flooded Rice (Oryza sativa) and Three Echinochloa Species to Changes in Environmental Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mohamed Bouhache
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616
David E. Bayer
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616

Abstract

The photosynthetic responses of rice (C3) and three Echinochloa species (C4), barnyardgrass, early watergrass, and late watergrass, to changes in CO2 intercellular partial pressure, light intensity, and leaf temperature were investigated under laboratory conditions. The three Echinochloa species exhibited photosynthetic responses characteristic of C4 plants. The three weedy species showed higher efficiency for CO2 utilization at low CO2 intercellular partial pressure (CO2i) than rice. Compensation and saturation of CO2i for photosynthesis were lower in the weedy species than in rice. The maximum photosynthetic rates at high light intensity were 33.5, 32.7, 30.5, and 21.5 μmol CO2 m-2s-1 for barnyardgrass, early watergrass, late watergrass, and rice, respectively. Photosynthesis temperature optimum was 35 to 37 C for the three Echinochloa species and 33 C for rice. Overall, under simulated summer conditions, the four taxa showed a photosynthetic ability hierarchy with regard to gas exchange performance as follows: barnyardgrass ≥ early watergrass > late watergrass > rice.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Assemat, L. and Oka, H. I. 1980. Neighbor effects between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli Beauv.) strains. I. Performance in mixture and aggressiveness as influenced by planting density. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 1, 4:371394.Google Scholar
2. Assemat, L., Morishima, H., and Oka, H. I. 1981. Neighbor effects between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli Beauv.) strains. II. Some experiments on the mechanisms of interaction between plants. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 1, 1:6378.Google Scholar
3. Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Christie, E. K. and Detling, J. K. 1982. Analysis of interference between C3 and C4 grasses in relation to temperature and soil nitrogen supply. Ecology 63:12771284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Field, C. B., Ball, J. T., and Berry, J. A. 1991. Photosynthesis: principles and field techniques. Pages 209253 in Pearcy, R. W., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., and Rundel, P. W., eds. Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
6. Hill, J. E. 1984. On weeds and rice. Proc. Calif. Weed Conf. 36:6367.Google Scholar
7. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
8. Holt, J. S. 1991. Applications of physiological ecology to weed science. Weed Sci. 39:521528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Holt, J. S. and Orcutt, D. R. 1991. Functional relationship of growth and competitiveness in perennial weeds and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 39:575584.Google Scholar
10. Monson, R. K. 1989. On the evolutionary pathways resulting in C4 photosynthesis and Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM). Pages 6162 in Begon, M., Fitter, A. H., Ford, E. D., and MacFadyen, A. eds. Advances in Ecological Research. Vol. 19. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Murata, Y. 1961. Studies on the photosynthesis of rice plants. Bull. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci. (Japan), Series D 9:1169.Google Scholar
12. Ozturk, M., Rehder, H., and Ziegler, H. 1981. Biomass production of C3 and C4 plant species in pure and mixed culture with different water supply. Oecologia 50:7381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Pearcy, R. W. 1976. Temperature responses of growth and photosynthetic CO2 exchange rates in coastal and desert races of Atriplex lentiformis . Oecologia (Berl.) 26:245255.Google Scholar
14. Pearcy, R. W. 1985. The influence of environment on competitive ability. Proc. Calif. Weed Conf. 37:6065.Google Scholar
15. Pearcy, R. W., Schulze, E.–D., and Zimmermann, R. 1991. Measurement of transpiration and leaf conductance. Pages 137160 in Pearcy, R. W., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., and Rundel, P. W., eds. Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
16. Pearcy, R. W. and Ehleringer, J. 1984. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant, Cell Environ. 7:113.Google Scholar
17. Pearcy, R. W., Tumosa, N., and Williams, K. 1981. Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant. Oecologia (Berl.) 48:371376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. 1984. Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 265 pp.Google Scholar
19. Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. N. 1992. Photosynthesis. Pages 225265 in Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Wadsworth Publ. Co., Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
20. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1974. Competition of barnyardgrass with rice cultivars. Weed Sci. 22:423426.Google Scholar
21. Zhong, H. 1986. Comparative ecophysiology of Oryza sativa (rice) and Echinochloa crus-galli var. oryzicola (barnyardgrass). M. S. Thesis, Univ. California, Davis, CA. 107 pp.Google Scholar
22. Zimdahl, R. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition—A Review. Int. Plant Prot. Ctr., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 195 pp.Google Scholar