Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:57:45.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photosynthetic Productivity of Mayweed Chamomile (Anthemis cotula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Gealy ,
Sheila A. Squier  and
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Washington State Univ.
Sheila A. Squier
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Washington State Univ.
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Photosynthetic productivity parameters were determined for mayweed chamomile, a troublesome annual weed of the cropping systems in the Pacific Northwest. At a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1800 μE m−2 s–1, maximum net photosynthetic rate of greenhouse-grown plants was 35 mg CO2 dm−2 h–1 and maximum transpiration rate was 6.7 μg H2O cm−2 s–1. Dark respiration rate was 1.4 mg CO2 dm−2 h–1 and the light compensation point was 17.5 μE m−2 s–1. Carbon dioxide compensation point increased from 25 ppm at 15 C to 43 ppm at 30 C. At saturating photosynthetic photon flux densities, optimum leaf temperature for net photosynthesis was about 25 C. Maximum net photosynthesis of leaves of field-grown plants averaged 15.8 mg CO2 dm−2 h–1. After a 24-h exposure to 0.075 kg ha–1 metribuzin, maximum net photosynthesis and transpiration were reduced 85 and 40%, respectively. Soil water deficits reduced maximum net photosynthesis about 50%.

Keywords

Mayweed chamomileAnthemis cotula L. # ANTCOmetribuzin4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneCompensation pointmetribuzintranspirationmoisture deficitthylakoid bindingquantum yieldlight utilization efficiencyANTCO
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 18 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1981. Mode of Action of Herbicides. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
2. Bassham, J. A. 1979. The reductive pentose phosphate cycle and its regulation. Pages 9–30 in Gibbs, M. and Latzko, E., eds. Photosynthesis H. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
3. Buman, R. A., Gealy, D. R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1990. Protoplast absorption and thylakoid binding of metribuzin and its ethylthio analog by wheat, downy brome, and jointed goatgrass. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 43:109.Google Scholar
4. Buman, R. A., Gealy, D. R., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Inhibition of net photosynthesis in downy brome and jointed goatgrass protoplasts by metribuzin and its ethylthio analog. Proc. West Soc. Weed Sci. 41:76.Google Scholar
5. Campbell, G. S. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chodova, D. and Zemanek, Z. 1976. The effect of the herbicide simazine on the respiration rate of scentless mayweed, silky apera, white mustard, wheat, and maize. Sb. UVTIZ-Ochr. Rostl. 12(4):293–298.Google Scholar
7. Cooperative Extension Service. 1990. Pages 37–44, 47–49, and 92–94 in Pacific Northwest Weed Control Handbook. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.Google Scholar
8. Davies, W. J., Wilson, J. A., Sharp, R. E., and Osonubi, O. 1981. Control of stomatal behaviour in water-stressed plants. Soc. Exp. Biol. 8:163–185.Google Scholar
9. Devlin, D. L., Gealy, D. R., and Morrow, L. A. 1987. Differential absorption and translocation of metribuzin by downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:1–5.Google Scholar
10. Gawronski, S., Haderlie, L., Callihan, R., and Dwelle, R. 1985. Metribuzin absorption, translocation, and distribution in two potato (Solatium tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Sci. 33:629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gealy, D. R. 1987. Gas exchange properties of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 35:482–489.Google Scholar
12. Gealy, D. R. 1988. Growth, gas exchange, and germination of several jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) accessions. Weed Sci. 36:176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gealy, D. R. 1988. Rapid detection and time course monitoring of herbicide-induced photosynthetic inhibition in jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host.) using infrared gas analysis. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:86.Google Scholar
14. Gealy, D. R. 1989. Response of gas exchange in jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) to environmental conditions. Weed Sci. 37:562–569.Google Scholar
15. Gealy, D. R. and Buman, R. A. 1989. Response of photosynthesis and growth of jointed goatgrass and wheat to photosynthetic herbicides and temperature. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:151–152.Google Scholar
16. Hobbs, S.L.A. 1987. Comparison of photosynthesis in normal and triazine-resistant (Brassica). Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:457–466.Google Scholar
17. Jones, H. G. 1983. Plants and Microclimate, a Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Pages 186–211.Google Scholar
18. Krause, G. H. and Klosson, R. J. 1982. Effects of freezing stress on photosynthetic reactions in cold acclimated and unhardened plant leaves. Pages 245–256 in Marcelle, R., Clijsters, H., and Van Poucke, M., eds. Advances in Agricultural Biotechnology: Effects of Stress on Photosynthesis. Proceedings of a conference. Dipenbeek, Belgium.Google Scholar
19. Long, S. P., East, T. M., and Baker, N. R. 1983. Chilling damage to photosynthesis in young Zea mays. Effects of light and temperature variation on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation. J. Exp. Bot 34:177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Long, S. P. and Hallgren, J.-E. 1985. Measurement of CO2 assimilation by plants in the field and the laboratory. Pages 62–94 in Coombs, J., Hall, D. O., Long, S. P., and Scurlock, J.M.O., eds. Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
21. Ludlow, M. M. 1981. Effect of temperature on light utilization efficiency of leaves in C3 legumes and C4 grasses. Photosynthesis Res. 1:243–249.Google Scholar
22. Ludlow, M. M. and Ng, T. T. 1976. Photosynthetic light response curves of leaves from controlled environment facilities, glass-houses or outdoors. Photosynthetica 10:457–462.Google Scholar
23. Mahall, B. E., Parker, V. T., and Fonteyan, P. J. 1981. Growth and photosynthetic irradiance responses of (Avena fatua L. and Bromus diandrus Roth.) and their ecological significance in California savannas. Photosynthetica 15:5–15.Google Scholar
24. Monson, R. K., Stidham, M. A., Williams, G. J. III, Edwards, G. E., and Uribe, E. G. 1982. Temperature dependence of photosynthesis in (Agropyron smithii Rydb.) Plant Physiol. 69:921–928.Google Scholar
25. Morishita, D. W., Thill, D. C., and Callihan, R. H. 1985. Broadleaf and grassy weed control in no tillage winter wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Pages 307–308.Google Scholar
26. Mustardy, L. A., Vu, T. T., and Daniel, A. F. 1982. Stomatal response and photosynthetic capacity of maize leaves at low temperature. A study on varietal differences in chilling sensitivity. Physiol. Plant 55:31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Reference deleted in proof.Google Scholar
28. Olech, K. 1969. Influence of some herbicides on photosynthesis and respiration of crop plants and weeds. II. Correlation between the action of atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-S-triazine) and external conditions. Lublin-Univ-Marii-Curie-sklodowskiej-Ann-Sect-E. 22:149–166.Google Scholar
29. Pallett, K. E. and Dodge, A. D. 1980. Studies into the action of some photosynthetic inhibitor herbicides. J. Exp. Bot. 31:1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Parkinson, K. J. and Day, W. 1982. The influence of water stress on photosynthesis in a barley crop. Pages 65–74 in Marcelle, R., Clijsters, H., and Van Poucke, M., eds. Advances in Agricultural Biotechnology: Effects of Stress on Photosynthesis. Proceedings of a conference. Dipenbeek, Belgium.Google Scholar
31. Powles, S. B., Berry, J. A., and Björkman, O. 1983. Interaction between light and chilling temperature on the inhibition of photosynthesis in chilling-sensitive plants. Plant. Cell Environ. 6:117–123.Google Scholar
32. Rajendrudu, G. R., Rama Prasad, J. S., and Rama Dass, V. S. 1987. Correlation between the rates of foliar dark respiration and net photosynthesis in some tropical dicot weeds. Weed Sci. 35:141–144.Google Scholar
33. Reginier, E. E., Salvucii, M. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Photosynthesis and growth responses to irradiance in soybean (Glycine max) and three broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. 36:487–496.Google Scholar
34. Richardson, J. M., Gealy, D. R., and Morrow, L. A. 1989. Influence of moisture deficits on the reproductive ability of downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci 37:525–530.Google Scholar
35. Schmidt, R. R. and Fedtke, C. 1977. Metamitron activity in tolerant and susceptible plants. Pestic. Sci. 8:611–617.Google Scholar
36. Schulze, D. D. and Hall, A. E. 1982. Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. Pages 181–230 in Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H., eds. Physiological Plant Ecology II, Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
37. Sharma, S. P., Gupta, R. K., and Kauraw, D. L. 1981. Transpiration and leaf water potential of wheat in relation to changing soil water potential. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 150:264–270.Google Scholar
38. Sirohi, G. S. and Shirivastava, A. K. 1978. Carbon dioxide compensation concentration and its relationship to photorespiration and net carbon exchange–a review. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 21:70–89.Google Scholar
39. Smith, E. W., Tolbert, N. E., and Ku, Han San. 1976. Variables affecting the CO2 compensation point Plant Physiol. 58:143–146.Google Scholar
40. Squier, S. A. 1986. Photosynthetic productivity and germination response of Mayweed chamomile (Anthemis cotula L.). M.S. Thesis. Dep. Agron. and Soils, Washington State Univ. 99 pp.Google Scholar
41. Squier, S. A. and Gealy, D. R. 1986. Photosynthetic productivity of Mayweed chamomile (Anthemis cotula L.). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 39:174–175.Google Scholar
42. Stephens, R. H. 1989. A growth analysis and interference study between Mayweed chamomile (Anthemis cotula) and peas (Pisum sativum L.). M.S. Thesis. Dep. Hortic. and Landscape Architecture, Washington State Univ. 81 pp.Google Scholar
43. Stephens, R. H. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1990. Growth analysis over time of May weed chamomile (Anthemis cotula) interference with peas (Pisum sativum). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:150.Google Scholar
44. Stewart, D. W. and Dwyer, L. M. 1983. Stomatal response to plant water deficits. J. Theor. Biol. 104:655–666.13.Google Scholar
45. Ticha, I. and Catsky, J. 1981. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves. 5. Carbon dioxide compensation concentration. Photosynthetica 15:401–428.Google Scholar
46. Tischer, W. and Strotmann, H. 1977. Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 460:113–125.Google Scholar
47. Whitesides, R. E. and Swan, D. G. 1986. Metribuzin and ethyl-metribuzin for downy brome control in winter wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Pages 230–231.Google Scholar
48. Yang, Y. -S., and Bingham, S. W. 1984. Effects of metribuzin on net photosynthesis of Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.). Weed Sci. 32:247–250.Google Scholar
49. Yenne, S. P., Thill, D. C., and Callihan, R. H. 1986. Jointed goatgrass control in winter wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Pages 240–243.Google Scholar