Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:43:17.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenology of Reproduction of Medusahead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Young ,
Raymond A. Evans  and
Burgess L. Kay
James A. Young
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Ser., U. S. Dep. of Agr., University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada
Raymond A. Evans
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Ser., U. S. Dep. of Agr., University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada
Burgess L. Kay
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phenology of reproduction was highly variable among 23 selections of medusahead (Taeniatherum asperum (Sim.) Nevski). Selections with markedly early and late maturity were observed. The phenology generally was consistent during 4 years of testing at Reno, Nevada, and during 2 years at Davis, California. Individual selections differed greatly in phenology between two locations. Some of the selections exhibited phenotypic plasticity in phenology when grown in competition with other weeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 1970 , pp. 451 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Evans, R. A., Holbo, H. R., Eckert, R. E. Jr., and Young, J. A. 1970. Functional environment of downy brome communities in relation to weed control and revegetation. Weed Sci. 18: 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Frey, K. J. 1954. Inheritance and heritability of heading in barley. Agron. J. 46:226–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gustafsson, A. 1947. Mutations in agricultural plants. Hereditas 33:1–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hironaka, M. 1961. The relative rate of root development of cheatgrass and medusahead. J. Range Manage. 14:263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. McKell, C. M., Robison, J. P., and Major, J. 1962. Ecotypic variation in medusahead, an introduced annual grass. Ecology 43:686–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Nelson, J. R. and Wilson, A. M. 1969. Influence of age and awn removal on dormancy of medusahead seeds. J. Range Manage. 22:289–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sharp, L. A. and Tisdale, E. W. 1952. Medusahead, a problem on some Idaho ranges. Res. Note (3). Forest, Wildlife, and Range Exp. Sta., University of Idaho. 3 p.Google Scholar
8. Sharp, L. A., Tisdale, E. W., and Hironaka, M. 1957. Viability of medusahead seed collected in Idaho. J. Range Manage. 10:123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Smith, L. 1951. Cytology and genetics of barley. Bot. Rev. 17:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1970. Invasion of medusahead into the Great Basin. Weed Sci. 18:89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of medusahead in response to temperature and after-ripening. Weed Sci. 16:92–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of medusahead in response to osmotic stress. Weed Sci. 16:364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1969. Emergence of medusahead and other grasses from four seeding depths. Weed Sci. 17:376–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar