Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:56:14.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistence of Norflurazon in Five Georgia Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jill Schroeder
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, 30602
Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, 30602

Abstract

Norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinone] persistence in five Georgia soils after application to the same plots in 1982 and 1983 was characterized by rapid initial degradation followed by slow loss of the herbicide. The rate of norflurazon loss at each location for each year was not affected by application rate (1.7 or 3.4 kg ai/ha). Relative rates of norflurazon loss were Dothan loamy sand ≥ Greenville sandy clay loam ≥ Rome gravelly clay loam = Appling coarse sanely loam > Bradson clay loam. The rate of dissipation was slower in 1983 than 1982 in the Greenville and Appling soils. Cool and/or dry environmental conditions combined with higher soil organic matter content caused slower herbicide loss. Norflurazon residue 1 yr after treatment in all soils was greater in 1983 than in 1982. Significant injury to grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’) was observed in the spring of 1984 at all locations in all plots that were treated with norflurazon for the previous two seasons. The degree of injury corresponded to the concentration of norflurazon detected at that sampling date. Leaching did not appear to be an important method of norflurazon loss.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brady, S. S., van Hoek, C., and Boyd, V. F. 1978. Norflurazon. Pages 415435 in Zweig, G. and Sherma, J., eds. Analytical Methods for Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators. Vol. 10. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
2. Carringer, R. D., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Adsorption-desorption of selected pesticides by organic matter and montmorillonite. J. Agric. Food Chen. 23:568572.Google Scholar
3. Keeling, J. W. and Abernathy, J. R. 1983. Rotational crop response to fluridone and norflurazon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36: 155.Google Scholar
4. Kvien, J. Schroeder, and Banks, P. A. 1985. Soil surface degradation of norflurazon. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 25:95.Google Scholar
5. Lo, Chi-Chu and Merkle, M. G. 1984. Factors affecting the phytotoxicity of norflurazon. Weed Sci. 32:279283.Google Scholar
6. Rahn, P. R. and Zimdahl, R. I. 1973. Soil degradation of two phenyl pyridazinone herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:314317.Google Scholar
7. Winkler, V. W., Patel, J. R., Januszanis, M., and Colarusso, M. 1981. Determination of norflurazon residues in mixed crop matrices. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 64:13091311.Google Scholar