Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:47:01.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paraquat Soil Bonding and Plant Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. V. Tucker ,
D. E. Pack ,
J. N. Ospenson ,
A. Omid  and
W. D. Thomas Jr.
B. V. Tucker
Affiliation:
Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Division, Richmond, California
D. E. Pack
Affiliation:
Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Division, Richmond, California
J. N. Ospenson
Affiliation:
Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Division, Richmond, California
A. Omid
Affiliation:
Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Division, Richmond, California
W. D. Thomas Jr.
Affiliation:
Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Division, Richmond, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The toxicity of 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium ion (paraquat) in soil can be related to the degree of bonding strength to the soil aggregates. Tightly bound material is unavailable to plants, while loosely bound material can be potentially available to plants. On the basis of growth of corn (Zea mays L., var. Golden Cross Bantam) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L., var. Idaho 1-11) in sand, loamy sand, loam, and muck treated with paraquat, it is concluded that planned and careful application would not lead to accumulation of lethal dosages in medium to heavy soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 448 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, G. W. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning bioactivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bear, F. E. 1955. Chemistry of the Soil. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York. 371 p.Google Scholar
3. Boon, W. R. 1964. The chemistry of mode of action of the bipyridylium herbicides diquat and paraquat. Outlook Agr. 4:163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Coats, G. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., Lawrence, J. M., and Davis, D. E. 1966. Factors affecting persistence and interaction of diquat and paraquat. Weed Res. 6:58–66.Google Scholar
5. Funderburk, H. H. Jr. and Lawrence, J. M. 1964. Mode of action and metabolism of diquat and paraquat. Weeds 12:259–264.Google Scholar
6. Knight, B. A. and Tomlinson, T. E. 1967. The interaction of paraquat (1:1′-dimethyl 4:4′bipyridylium dichloride) with mineral soils. J. Soil Sci. 18:223–243.Google Scholar
7. Piper, C. S. 1944. Soil and Plant Analysis. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York. 368 p.Google Scholar
8. Shaw, B. T. 1952. Soil Physical Condition and Plant Growth. Vol. 11 of Agronomy, a Series of Monographs. Academic Press, Inc., New York. 491 p.Google Scholar
9. Springett, R. H. 1965. The bipyridylium herbicides: Their properties and uses. Outlook Agr. 4:226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Taylor, T. D. and Amling, H. J. 1963. Persistence and penetration of two dipyridyl quaternary salts in sandy loam soil. Proc. SWC 16:405.Google Scholar
11. Tucker, B. V., Pack, D. E., and Ospenson, J. N. 1968. Absorption of bipyridylium herbicides in soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:1005–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Van Slyke, D. D., Plazin, J., and Weisiger, J. R. 1951. Reagents for the Van Slyke-Folch wet carbon combustion. J. Biol. Chem. 191:229–304.Google Scholar
13. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D and Prometone by clay, charcoal, and an anion-exchange resin. Proc. Amer. Soc. Soil Sci. 29:678–688.Google Scholar
14. Weber, J. B. and Scott, D. C. 1966. Availability of a cationic herbicide absorbed on clay minerals to cucumber seedlings. Science 152:1400–1402.Google Scholar