Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:28:19.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Noncompetitive Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) on Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Petros C. Lolas
Affiliation:
Tobacco Inst., Drama, Greece and Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 26750
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Tobacco Inst., Drama, Greece and Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 26750

Abstract

Studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine if johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] rhizomes in the soil exude or produce substances that can affect soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seedling growth. Fresh and dry weights of soybean seedlings were dependent on the concentration of rhizomes present in the soil before soil samples were used for soybean growth, and on the time of year when soil samples were collected. In studies on rhizome residues, soybean seedling dry weight decreased as percent of dry, decayed rhizomes in the soil increased. For each rhizome concentration, soybean growth inhibition decreased as decay time increased. Fresh and dry weights of soybean plants were reduced by diluted fresh rhizome extract used for irrigation once a week for 3 weeks. Since no rhizomes were present in most of the soils during soybean growth and since nutrient concentrations, organic matter, and pH were not different among the soils used, it is suggested that johnsongrass rhizomes living or decaying in the soil exude, contain, or produce substances that exhibit allelopathic characteristics to soybean growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abdul-Wahab, A. S. and Rice, E. L. 1967. Plant inhibition by johnsongrass and its possible significance in old field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 94:486497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cohran, V. L., Elliott, L. F., and Papendick, R. I. 1977. The production of phytotoxins from surface crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 41:903908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. DeCandolle, M. A. 1832. Physiologie Végétale. Vol. III. Bechet Jeune Lib. Fac. Med., Paris. 1474 pp.Google Scholar
4. Friedman, T. and Horowitz, M. 1970. Phytotoxicity of subterranean residues of three perennial weeds. Weed Res. 10:382385.Google Scholar
5. Friedman, T. and Horowitz, M. 1971. Biologically active substances in subterranean parts of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:398401.Google Scholar
6. Garb, S. 1961. Differential growth inhibitors produced by plants. Bot. Rev. 27:442443.Google Scholar
7. Grummer, G. 1961. The role of toxic substances in the interrelations between higher plants. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 15:219228.Google Scholar
8. Guenzi, W. D., McCalla, T. M., and Norstaff, F. A. 1967. Presence and persistence of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn, and sorghum residues. Agron. J. 59:163165.Google Scholar
9. Holm, L. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci. 17:2037.Google Scholar
10. Horowitz, M. and Friedman, T. 1971. Biological activity of subterranean residues of Cynodon dactylon L., Sorghum halepense L. and Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 11:8893.Google Scholar
11. Kommedahl, R., Kotheimer, J. B., and Bernardini, J. B. 1959. The effect of quackgrass on germination and seedling growth of certain crop plants. Weeds 7:112.Google Scholar
12. Lawrence, T. and Kilcher, M. R. 1962. The effect of fourteen root extracts upon germination and seedling length of fifteen plant species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:308313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. LeTourneau, D., Failes, G. D., and Heggeness, H. G. 1956. The effect of aqueous extracts of plant tissue on germination of seeds and growth of seedlings. Weeds 4:363368.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Growth and development of johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 19:141142.Google Scholar
15. McWhorter, C. G. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:5659.Google Scholar
16. Muller, C. 1969. Allelopathy as a factor in ecological process. Vegetatio 18:348357.Google Scholar
17. Nielsen, K. F., Cuddy, T. F., and Woods, E. B. 1960. The influence of the extract of some crops and soil residues on germination and growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:188197.Google Scholar
18. Patrick, Z. A., Toussoun, T. A., and Snyder, W. C. 1963. Phytotoxic substances in arable soils associated with decomposition of plant residues. Phytopathology 53:152161.Google Scholar
19. Petersen, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:201208.Google Scholar
20. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York. 345 pp.Google Scholar
21. Ripley, P. O. 1941. The infuence of crops upon those which follow. Sci. Agric. 21:522583.Google Scholar
22. Rovira, A. D. 1969. Plant root exudates. Bot. Rev. 35:3551.Google Scholar
23. Schreiner, O. and Reed, H. S. 1970. The production of deleterious excretions by roots. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 34:279303.Google Scholar
24. Tukey, H. B. 1969. Implications of allelopathy in agricultural plant science. Bot. Rev. 35:116.Google Scholar
25. Whittaker, R. H. and Feeny, P. P. 1971. Allelochemics: Chemical interactions among species. Science 171:757770.Google Scholar