Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:39:14.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen interactions with medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum) seedbanks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Young ,
James D. Trent ,
Robert R. Blank  and
Debra E. Palmquist
James D. Trent
Affiliation:
310 South College, Mt. Carroll, IL 61053
Robert R. Blank
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
Debra E. Palmquist
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Medusahead is an invasive annual grass that, once established, severely affects range-land productivity and stability. Medusahead builds large seedbanks in the litter and on the soil surface. Effective weed control of medusahead involves either inhibiting germination from the seedbank, eliminating the seedbank, or enhancing germination so that plants are available for control. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of nitrogen enrichment, immobilization, and nitrification inhibition treatments in the field on the size and germination status of medusahead seedbanks. The germination status of medusahead seeds in seedbanks was determined by periodically collecting field samples of surface soil and litter and bioassaying them in greenhouse emergence tests. Control seedbanks had increased seedling emergence with KNO3 or GA3 enrichment of the bioassay substrate. The combination of these two materials increased emergence. Nitrogen enrichment increased seedling establishment in the field. Carbon enrichment in the field decreased seedling establishment and increased medusahead seeds in seedbanks. Nitrapyrin treatment decreased medusahead in the field similar to carbon enrichment. In comparison to the control or other treatments, GA3 enrichment was not as effective in increasing emergence from nitrapyrin-treated bioassay samples. The combination of carbon and nitrapyrin treatments was very effective in eliminating medusahead emergence in the field, but in wetter years, it never completely eliminated medusahead seedling recruitment and subsequent reproduction. These treatments have promise for influencing succession in medusahead infestations if an adapted perennial species, capable of competing under low nitrogen levels, becomes available.

Keywords

Nitrapyrinmedusahead, (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum [Simk.] Melderis) ELYCMAnnual grassgibberellinnitrapyrinELYCMnitrificationseedbanks
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 191 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blank, R. R., Trent, J. D., and Young, J. A. 1992. Sagebrush communities on clayey soils of northeastern California, a fragile equilibrium. Pages 198–200 in Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecology and Management of Riparian Shrub Communities. General Technical Rep. 289. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Brenchley, W. E. and Warington, K. 1930. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. J. Ecol. 18: 235–272.Google Scholar
Harris, G. A. 1967. Some competitive relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum . Ecol. Monogr. 37: 89–111.Google Scholar
Hironaka, M. and Sindelar, B. W. 1973. Reproduction success of squirreltail in medusahead infested ranges. J. Range Manage. 26: 219–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karssen, C. M. and Hilorst, H.W.M. 1992. Effect of chemical environment on seed germination. Pages 327–347 in Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International.Google Scholar
Kay, B. L. and Evans, R. A. 1965. Effects of fertilization on a mixed stand of cheatgrass and intermediate wheatgrass. J. Range Manage. 18: 7–11.Google Scholar
McLendon, T. and Redente, E. F. 1992. Effects of nitrogen limitation on species replacement dynamics during early succession on a semiarid sagebrush site. Oecologia 91: 312–317.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1986. Nitrogen-limited growth in plants from different successional states. Ecology 67: 555–563.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1987. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 189–214.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. 1992. Ecology and management of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum [Simk.] Melderis). Great Basin Nat. 52: 245–252.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1970. Invasion of medusahead into the Great Basin. Weed Sci. 18: 89–97.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1975. Germinability of seed reserves in a big sagebrush community. Weed Sci. 23: 358–364.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of medusahead in response to temperature and afterripening. Weed Sci. 16: 92–95.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1969. Population dynamics of downy brome. Weed Sci. 17: 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Kay, B. L. 1971. Germination of caryopses of annual grasses in simulated litter. Agron. J. 63: 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar