Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:35:55.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Near-isogenic lines for Triticum aestivum height and crop competitiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven S. Seefeldt ,
Alex G. Ogg Jr.  and
Yuesheng Hou
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
National A. cylindrica Research Program, P.O. Box 53, Ten Sleep, WY 82442
Yuesheng Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Near isolines of ‘Nugaines’ winter Triticum aestivum that differed in height were planted with and without Aegilops cylindrica to determine the effect of plant height on competition against A. cylindrica. The isolines had either reduced height gene Rht 1, Rht 2, Rht 1 plus Rht 2, or neither Rht genes and averaged 79, 77, 51, and 101 cm tall, respectively, when grown with or without competition from A. cylindrica. Plants with fewer reduced height genes had the faster rates of height and weight gain, which are important traits for enhanced competitiveness. When growing in competition with A. cylindrica, the shortest isoline allowed the greatest amount of A. cylindrica seed production but did not have the lowest T. aestivum yield. However, when compared to the A. cylindrica-free control, the shortest isoline had the greatest percent yield loss. The tallest isoline reduced A. cylindrica seed production the most, and T. aestivum yield reduction due to A. cylindrica on a percent basis was the least when averaged over 2 yr. When competing against A. cylindrica, the tallest isoline did not always have the largest yield and yield parameters, and the shortest isoline did not always have the smallest yield and yield parameters. There is a cost to the T. aestivum plant to produce extra stem biomass that may reduce yield potential of taller plants and reduce the advantage gained by being taller than the surrounding weeds.

Keywords

BromoxynildiclofopthifensulfurontribenuronAegilops cylindrica Host AEGCY, jointed goatgrassTriticum aestivum L., winter wheatGrowth rateyieldisolinesAEGCY
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 316 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allan, R. E. 1986. Agronomic comparisons among wheat lines nearly isogenic for three reduced-height genes. Crop Sci. 26:707–710.Google Scholar
Allan, R. E. 1997. Agronomic performance of plant height near-isolines of Nugaines wheat. Wheat Information Service. 85:31–34.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Differential competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars against downy brome. Agron. J. 86:649–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challaiah, O. C. Burnside, G. A. Wicks, and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 5:3–17.Google Scholar
Dotray, P. A. and Young, F. L. 1993. Characterization of root and shoot development of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 41:353–361.Google Scholar
Fenster, C. R. and Wicks, G. A. 1976. Jointed Goatgrass. Nebraska University Cooperative Extension Service G 75–210. 2 p.Google Scholar
Fiez, T. E. and Miller, B. C. 1995. Varying winter wheat seeding rates among landscape positions. J. Prod. Agric. 8:146–350.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36:479–486.Google Scholar
Jennings, R. R. and Aquino, R. C. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22:529–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., Cousens, R. D., and Coombes, N. E. 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res. 36:505–513.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Seefeldt, S. S. 1999. Characterizing traits which enhance competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 47:74–80.Google Scholar
Rickman, R. W., Klepper, B., and Peterson, C. M. 1985. Wheat seedling growth and developmental response to incident photosynthetically active radiation. Agron. J. 77:283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar