Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:58:26.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

My view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger Cousens*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, Institute of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

References

Literature Cited

Cousens, R. 1988. Misinterpretation of results in weed research through inappropriate use of statistics. Weed Res. 28:281289.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5:664673.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1996. Design and interpretation of interference studies: are some methods totally unacceptable? N. Z. J. For. Sci. 26:518.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. D., Gill, G. S., and Speijers, E. J. 1997. Comment: number of sample populations required to determine the effects of herbicide resistance on plant growth and fitness. Weed Res. 37:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Arnold, R.L.B., Sanchez, R., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Field Crops Res. 67:123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N. 1999. Fitness effects of the triazine resistance mutation in Amaranthus hybridus: relative fitness in maize and soybean crops. Weed Res. 39:493505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropff, M. J. 1988. Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production. Weed Res. 28:465471.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Gill, G. S., Murphy, C. E., Walker, S. R., Cousens, R. D., Mokhtari, S., Peltzer, S. J., Coleman, R., and Luckett, D. J. 2001. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52:527548.Google Scholar