Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:07.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movement and Distribution of Pyrazon in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Smith  and
W. F. Meggitt
D. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Michigan State University
W. F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two months after 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone (pyrazon) application (2.7 kg/ha), 80 to 100% of the total residue (1.3 to 4.2 μg/g) was in the upper 5 cm of soil. Herbicide movement occurred in soils that contained 3.8% organic matter or less. Pyrazon did not move below 10 cm or accumulate in soil as a result of movement. Adsorption of pyrazon was related to soil organic matter content (r = 0.90) and accounted for differences in herbicide movement previously observed. Calculations of pyrazon movement, based on soil organic matter content, coincided with depths of movement observed under field conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , March 1970 , pp. 255 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids with implications concerning bioactivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:324–332.Google Scholar
2. Frank, R. 1967. Studies on pyrazon under controlled environmental conditions. Weeds 15:355–358.Google Scholar
3. Harris, C. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:6–10.Google Scholar
4. Harris, C. I. and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Influence of soil properties on adsorption and phytotoxicity of CIPC, diuron, and simazine. Weeds 13:215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Harris, C. I. and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.Google Scholar
6. Hemwall, J. B. 1962. Theoretical consideration of soil fumigation. Phytopathology 52:1108–1115.Google Scholar
7. Kearney, P. C., Harris, C. I., Kaufman, D. D., and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Behavior and fate of chlorinated aliphatic acids in soils. Adv. Pest Contr. Res. 6:1–30.Google Scholar
8. Loustalot, A. J. and Ferrer, R. 1950. Studies on the persistence and movement of sodium trichloroacetate in the soil. Agron. J. 42:323–327.Google Scholar
9. Smith, D. T. and Meggitt, W. F. 1967. Pre- and post-emergence sugar beet herbicide trials in Michigan. Res. Rep., North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:79.Google Scholar
10. Stephenson, G. R. and Ries, S. K. 1967. The movement and metabolism of pyrazon in tolerant and susceptible species. Weed Res. 7:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. U. S. Dep. of Com. Environmental Sci. Serv. 1964., 1965. Climatological Data, Michigan 79, 80.Google Scholar
12. Upchurch, R. P. 1966. Behavior of herbicides in soil. Residue Rev. 16:46–85.Google Scholar