Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:01:05.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral Content of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and Four Competing Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas C. Sanders ,
Allen S. Grayson  and
Thomas J. Monaco
Douglas C. Sanders
Affiliation:
Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Allen S. Grayson
Affiliation:
Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum ‘Roma VF’) and weeds were seeded at two locations in 1973 and 1974. In separate plots, jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.), tall morningglory [Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth.], and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) seedlings were thinned to densities ranging from 2.7 to 86 plants/m2. Densities of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] ranged from 11 to 430 plants/m2. There were a few instances of difference in nutrient concentrations in tomato and weed leaf tissue, but no clear relationship was evident between concentration of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S and weed density. Considerably more fruit weight was produced per kilogram of total assimilated N, P, and K in the weed-free than in the weed-infested tomato plots.

Keywords

Datura stramoniumIpomea purpureaXanthium pensylvanicumDigitaria sanguinalis
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , September 1981 , pp. 590 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. A.O.A.C. 1950. Methods of Analysis (7th ed.) P. O. Box 540, B. Franklin Street, Washington, DC. 910 pp.Google Scholar
2. Archibald, J. A. 1964. Weather effects on leaf-nutrient composition of fruit trees. Plant Anal, and Fert. Problems 4:1–8.Google Scholar
3. Blackman, G. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. Competition between cereal and annual weeds. J. Agric. Sci. 28:247–272.Google Scholar
4. Cannell, G. H., Tyler, K. B., and Asbell, C. W. 1959. The effects of irrigation and fertilizer on yield, blackheart, and nutrient uptake of celery. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 74:539–544.Google Scholar
5. Clements, H. F. 1964. Interactions of factors affecting yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 15:409–422.Google Scholar
6. Collins, H. A. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1962. (Abstr.). Effects of weeds on yield and growth characteristics of field corn grown at different nitrogen levels. Proc. Northwest Weed Control Conf. 16:329–331.Google Scholar
7. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.Google Scholar
8. Dumenil, L. 1961. Nitrogen and phosphorus composition of corn leaves and corn yields in relation to critical levels and nutrient balance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 25:295–298.Google Scholar
9. Emmert, F. H. 1959. Chemical analysis of tissue as a means of determining nutrient requirements of deciduous fruit plants. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73:521–547.Google Scholar
10. Gleason, L. S. and Laird, R. J. 1956. The effect of weed competition on corn yields at different fertility levels. (Abstr.). Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 13:8–9.Google Scholar
11. Hibbard, A. D. and Nour, N. 1959. Leaf content of phosphorous and potassium under moisture stress. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73:33–39.Google Scholar
12. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Knoll, H. A., Brady, N. C., and Lathwell, D. J. 1964. Effect of soil temperature and phosphorous fertilization on the growth and phosphorous content of corn. Agron. J. 56:145–147.Google Scholar
14. Lange, A. H., Ehrler, W. L., and Hamner, K. C. 1959. Effects of environment on the uptake-transport of calcium and phosphorus by bean plants. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73:349–354.Google Scholar
15. McKell, C. M., Wilson, A. M., and Williams, W. A. 1962. Effects of temperature on phosphorus utilization by native and introduced legumes. Agron. J. 54:109–113.Google Scholar
16. Mederski, H. J. and Wilson, J. H. 1960. Relation of soil moisture to ion absorption by corn plants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24:149–152.Google Scholar
17. Miller, G. R. and Meggitt, W. F. 1962. Competition of weeds with sugar beets. (Abstr.). Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 19:21.Google Scholar
18. Monaco, T. J., Grayson, A., and Sanders, D. C. 1981. Influence of four weed species on the growth, yield and quality of directseeded tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
19. Peck, T. R., Walker, M. W., and Bonne, L. V. 1969. Relationship between corn (Zea mays L.) yield and leaf levels of ten elements. Agron. J. 61:299–301.Google Scholar
20. Power, J. F., Grunes, D. L., Willis, W. O., and Reichman, G. A. 1963. Soil temperature and phosphorus effects on barley growth. Agron. J. 55:389–392.Google Scholar
21. Roberts, A. N. and Kenworthy, A. L. 1956. Growth and composition of the strawberry plant in relation to root temperature and intensity of nutrition. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 68:157–168.Google Scholar
22. Shear, C. B., Craine, H. L., and Myers, A. T. 1946. Nutrientelement balance: A fundamental concept in plant nutrition. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 47:239–248.Google Scholar
23. Smith, P. F. 1962. Mineral analysis of plant tissues. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 13:18–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Thomas, P. E. L. and Schwerzei, P. J. 1968. A cotton/weed competition experiment. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 9:737–743.Google Scholar