Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:34:47.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microorganisms Associated with Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Seeds on the Soil Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Kremer*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Ser., Univ. Missouri. Columbia 65211 Dep. Agron., Univ. Missouri. Columbia 65211

Abstract

The relationships between microorganisms and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. # ABUTH) seeds in contact with soil were studied to determine microbial effects on velvetleaf seed viability. The characteristic seed microbial association persisted on velvetleaf seeds placed on the soil surface during 32 days of incubation. The fungal association comprised of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl., Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fres.) de Vries, Epicoccum purpurascens Ehrenb. ex Schlecht, and Fusarium spp. was detected on over 50% of the seeds during incubation. Establishment of soil microorganisms on 50% of seeds occurred at only one sampling date. Such establishment was largely unsuccessful due to the effective barrier presented by seedborne microorganisms. Seedborne and soilborne microorganisms were unable to reduce viability of velvetleaf seeds in contact with soil as the total viability of all seeds tested exceeded 90% during incubation. Velvetleaf seedborne microorganisms may augment seed longevity on and in soils by acting as a barrier to potential seed decomposers originating from soil.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Weed-crop ecology. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, Mass. 465 pp.Google Scholar
2. Alexander, M. 1971. Microbial ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 511 pp.Google Scholar
3. Behmer, D. E. and McCalla, T. M. 1963. The inhibition of seedling growth by crop residues in soil inoculated with Penicillium urticae Bainer. Plant Soil 18:199206.Google Scholar
4. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York. 892 pp.Google Scholar
5. Kiewnick, L. 1964. Experiments on the influence of seedborne and soilborne microflora on the viability of wild oat seeds (Avena fatua L.) II. Experiments on the influences of microflora on the viability of seeds in the soil. Weed Res. 4:3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kremer, R. J., Hughes, L. B. Jr., and Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Examination of microorganisms and deterioration resistance mechanisms associated with velvetleaf seeds. Agron. J. 76:745749.Google Scholar
7. Roberts, E. H. 1972. Dormancy: A factor affecting seed survival in the soil. Pages 321359 in Roberts, E. H., ed. Viability of seeds. Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rolston, M. P. 1978. Water impermeable seed dormancy. Bot. Rev. 44:365396.Google Scholar
9. Schafer, P. E. and Chilcote, D. O. 1969. Factors influencing persistence and depletion in buried seed populations. I. A model for analysis of parameters of buried seed persistence and depletion. Crop Sci. 9:417419.Google Scholar
10. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1974. Dormancy changes and fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 22:151155.Google Scholar
11. van Leeuwan, B. H. 1981. Influence of microorganisms on the germination of the monocarpic Cirsium vulgare in relation to disturbance. Oecologia (Berlin) 48:112115.Google Scholar
12. Wilson, H. A. 1957. A method for inoculating solid media with soil for the isolation of fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 21:239.Google Scholar
13. Zorner, P. S., Zimdahl, R. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1984. Sources of viable seed loss in buried dormant and non-dormant populations of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed in Colorado. Weed Res. 24:143150.Google Scholar