Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:37:05.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lesion Nematode (Pratylenchus spp.) Infection of Weed Species and Fieldbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Roger E. Gast ,
Robert G. Wilson  and
Eric D. Kerr
Roger E. Gast
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Eric D. Kerr
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted during the summers of 1981 and 1982 in order to determine relative infection and population increase of lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) on seven weed species that commonly occur in field-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) fields in western Nebraska. Weeds were grown at three densities with and without fieldbeans. A representative sample of the root systems from plants in each plot was removed in August and the nematodes were extracted and counted. No difference in nematode infection rate was found among weed population levels. Nematodes per gram of dry root were not different in weeds grown with or without fieldbeans. Weeds grown with fieldbeans had smaller root systems, and consequently total nematodes per root system were less than in weeds grown in the absence of fieldbeans. There was a significant difference among most weed species when nematodes per gram of dry root were estimated. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarachoides Sendt. ♯3 SOLSA) and barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) ♯ ECHCG] supported the highest numbers of nematodes per g oven-dry roots, redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L. ♯ AMARE) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr. ♯ XANPE) had least numbers of nematodes/g oven-dry roots, and infestation levels on other weed species were variable but generally intermediate.

Keywords

Amaranthus retroflexusEchinochloa crus-galliHelianthus annuusSolanum sarachoidesXanthium pensylvanicumAMAREECHCGSOLSAXANPE
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , September 1984 , pp. 616 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agrios, G. N. 1978. Plant Pathology. Academic Press, New York. Pages 612–657.Google Scholar
2. Beiere, B. P. 1967. Pest Management. Leonard Hill Books, London, England. 123 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bendixen, L. E., Reynolds, D. A., and Riedel, R. M. 1979. An annotated bibliography of weeds as reservoirs for organisms affecting crops. Research Bull. 1109, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., Wooster, OH. 63 pp.Google Scholar
4. Chapman, R. A. 1958. The effect of root-lesion nematodes on the growth of red clover and alfalfa under greenhouse conditions. Phytopathology 48:525–545.Google Scholar
5. Christie, J. R. 1959. Plant nematodes – their bionomics and control. Agricultural Exp. Stn., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 256 pp.Google Scholar
6. Dropkin, V. H. 1980. Introduction to Plant Nematology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
7. Dunn, R. A. and Mai, W. F. 1973. Reproduction of Pratylenchus penetrans in roots of seven cover crop species in greenhouse experiments. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:728–730.Google Scholar
8. Ferris, V. R. and Bernard, R. L. 1962. Injury to soybeans caused by Pratylenchus alleni . Plant Dis. Rep. 42:181–184.Google Scholar
9. Franklin, M. T. 1970. Interrelationships of nematodes, weeds, herbicides, and crops. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 10:927–937.Google Scholar
10. Goodey, B. J. and Franklin, M. T. 1965. The nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London, England. 214 pp.Google Scholar
11. Hogger, C. H. and Bird, G. W. 1976. Weed and indicator hosts of plant-parasitic nematodes in Georgia cotton and soybean fields. Plant Dis. Rep. 60:223–226.Google Scholar
12. Jenkins, W. R. and Taylor, D. P. 1967. Plant Nematology. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York. 270 pp.Google Scholar
13. Kerr, E. D. and Steadman, J. R. 1973. Second year effects of Telone soil fumigation on dry bean yields, Fusarium root rot severity, and nematode populations. Annu. Rep. of the Bean Improvement Cooperative. No. 16.Google Scholar
14. Linford, M. B. 1939. Attractiveness of roots and excised shoot tissues to certain nematodes. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 6:11–18.Google Scholar
15. Manuel, J. S., Reynolds, D. A., and Riedel, R. M. 1980. Weeds as hosts of Pratylenchus . Research Bull. 1123, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., Wooster, OH. 25 pp.Google Scholar
16. Milker, P. M. and Ahrens, J. F. 1969. Influence of growing marigolds, weeds, two cover crops and fumigation on subsequent populations of parasitic nematodes and plant growth. Plant Dis. Rep. 53:642–646.Google Scholar
17. Rabb, R. L. and Guthrie, F. E., eds. 1970. Concepts of pest management. Proc. of a conference held at North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 242 pp.Google Scholar
18. Rich, J. R., Thomason, I. J., and Omelia, F. C. 1976. Host-parasite interactions of Pratylenchus scribeneri on selected crop plants. J. Nematol. 9:131–135.Google Scholar
19. Robbins, R. T., Dickerson, O. J., and Kyle, J. H. 1972. Pinto bean yield increased by chemical control of Pratylenchus spp. J. Nematol. 4:28–32.Google Scholar
20. Southey, J. F., ed. 1965. Plant Nematology. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, Tech. Bull. No. 7. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, England. 282 pp.Google Scholar
21. Wallace, H. R. 1963. The Biology of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Edward Arnold LTD, New York. 228 pp.Google Scholar
22. Williams, J. H. and Murfield, D. 1977. Agricultural Atlas of Nebraska. Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. 110 pp.Google Scholar
23. Wilson, R. G. 1979. Survey of pesticide use in irrigated regions of the Nebraska Panhandle. Neb. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 544, Lincoln, NE. 19 pp.Google Scholar
24. Zirakparvar, M. E., Norton, D. C., and Cox, C. P. 1980. Population increase of Pratylenchus hexincisus on corn as related to soil temperature and type. J. Nematol. 12:313–318.Google Scholar