Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:22:28.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lentil (Lens culinaris) Yield as Influenced by Duration of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William S. Curran ,
Larry A. Morrow  and
Ralph E. Whitesides
William S. Curran
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv.
Larry A. Morrow
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv.
Ralph E. Whitesides
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of wild oat (Avena fatua L. # AVEFA) interference in lentils (Lens culinaris Medik). An infestation of 32 and 65 wild oats/m2 maintained up to 5 weeks in the field did not reduce lentil grain yield. However, 32 wild oats/m2 reduced yields 32% when allowed to remain for 7 weeks and 49% if they remained until harvest time (11 weeks). Sixty-five wild oats/m2 reduced grain yield 42 and 61% for the same time periods, respectively. In the growth chamber, 69 wild oats/m2 reduced lentil plant dry weight 29% if allowed to remain for 3 weeks, 61% for 5 weeks, and 72% for 7 weeks (harvest time). The field data suggest that wild oat control measures may be delayed for several weeks after lentil emergence without reducing crop yield.

Keywords

CompetitionRhizobium leguminosarumFrankAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 1987 , pp. 669 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Basler, F. 1981. Weeds and their control. Pages 143–154 in Webb, C. and Hawtin, G., eds. Lentils. ICARDA, Syria.Google Scholar
2. Nieto, J. H., Brondo, M. A., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. Pestic. Art. News Sum. 14:159–166.Google Scholar
3. O'Donovan, J. T. and Sharma, M. P. 1983. Wild oats, competition and crop losses. Pages 27–42 in Smith, A. E., ed. Wild Oat Action Comm. Proc, Regina, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
4. Rathmann, D. P. and Miller, S. D. 1981. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:410–414.Google Scholar
5. Saxena, M. C. and Yadav, D. S. 1976. Agronomic studies on lentil under sub-tropical conditions of Pantnagar, India. Lens 3:17–26.Google Scholar
6. Saxena, M. C. and Wassimi, N. 1980. Crop-weed competition studies in lentils. Lens 7:55–57.Google Scholar
7. Schumacher, W. J., Thill, D. C., and Lee, G. A. 1983. Allelopathic potential of wild oat (Avena fatua) on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1235–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed