Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:55:10.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) Ecology and Interference in Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. L. Anderson
R. L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Akron, CO 80720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jointed goatgrass is a serious weed in winter wheat, and presently no herbicides are available for its selective control. This study examined the effect of time of emergence and removal on jointed goatgrass interference in winter wheat, as well as its rate of development and soil water extraction. The goal of this study was to suggest cultural practices that minimize jointed goatgrass interference in winter wheat. Jointed goatgrass development was identical to ‘Vona’ winter wheat in two crop seasons, even though precipitation differed drastically between seasons. Depth of soil water extraction of both species was also similar. Jointed goatgrass at 18 plants m−2 reduced grain yield 27 and 17% when emerging 0 and 42 d after Vona, respectively. The relationship between time of jointed goatgrass emergence after winter wheat and grain yield loss was Y = 30.6–0.29X (X = days, r = 0.72), indicating that plants emerging in late fall still caused yield loss. Removing jointed goatgrass by early March prevented winter wheat grain yield loss. The interference data suggests that producers assess infestation levels and plan control measures in early March.

Keywords

Jointed goatgrass, Aegilops cylindrica Host. #3 AEGCYwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Vona’Developmentsoil water extractiontime of emergencetime of removalcommunity yieldAEGCY
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 388 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Reproduction from seed. Pages 47–76 in Weed-Crop Ecology. Principles in Weed Management. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
2. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Nature of weed competition. Pages 189–213 in Weed-Crop Ecology. Principles in Weed Management. Brenton Publishers. North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
3. Aldrich, R. J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technol. 1:199–206.Google Scholar
4. Anderson, R. L. 1991. Timing of nitrogen application affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) growth in winter wheat. Weed Technol. 5:582–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Anderson, R. L. 1991. Seed viability development in field sandbur. Page 311 in West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Rep. Google Scholar
6. Anderson, R. L. and Nielsen, D. C. 1993. Emergence patterns of volunteer wheat, jointed goatgrass, and downy brome. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Rep. Chap. VI:4–5.Google Scholar
7. Bauer, A., Black, A. L., and Frank, A. B. 1989. Pages 1–22 in Soil water use by plant development stage of spring and winter wheat. North Dakota State Exp. Stn. Bull. 519.Google Scholar
8. Bauer, A., Smika, D., and Black, A. 1983. Pages 1–17 in Correlation of five wheat growth stage scales used in the Great Plains. USDA-ARS Adv. Agric. Technol. Bull. AAT-NC-7. USDA-ARS, North Cent. Reg., Peoria, IL.Google Scholar
9. Challaiah, O. C. Burnside, , Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cholick, F. A., Welsh, J. R., and Cole, C. V. 1977. Rooting patterns of semi-dwarf and tall winter cultivars under dryland field conditions. Crop Sci. 17:637–639.Google Scholar
11. Donald, W. W. 1984. Vernalization requirements for flowering of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 32:631–637.Google Scholar
12. Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 5:3–17.Google Scholar
13. Dotray, P. A. and Young, F. L. 1988. Rooting development and its relationship to shoot growth in jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 41:74.Google Scholar
14. Firbank, L. G. and Watkinson, A. R. 1986. Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effect upon crop yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:147–159.Google Scholar
15. Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36:479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Hill, L. V. 1977. Development, competition, and control of tansy mustard, jointed goatgrass, and field bindweed in winter wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater.Google Scholar
17. Hudson, C. 1989. Jointed goatgrass, cheatgrass, and volunteer rye in Colorado wheat survey. Colorado Agric. Statistics Serv., Lakewood, CO 80215.Google Scholar
18. Hulbert, L. C. 1955. Ecological studies of Bromus tectorum and other bromegrasses. Ecol. Monogr. 25:181–213.Google Scholar
19. Jordan, N. 1992. Weed demography and population dynamics: Implications for threshold management. Weed Technol. 6:184–190.Google Scholar
20. Klemmedson, J. O. and Smith, J. G. 1964. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Bot. Rev. 30:226–262.Google Scholar
21. Mann, S. S. 1976. Cytoplasmic homology between Aegilops squarrosa L. and A. cylindrica Host. Crop Sci. 16:757–761.Google Scholar
22. McMaster, G. S. and Smika, D. E. 1988. Estimation and evaluation of winter wheat phenology in the central Great Plains. Agric. For. Meteorol. 43:1–18.Google Scholar
23. Rydrych, D. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.Google Scholar
24. Rydrych, D. J. 1974. Competition between winter wheat and downy brome. Weed Sci. 22:211–214.Google Scholar
25. Smika, D. E. and Grabouski, P. H. 1976. Anhydrous ammonia application during fallow for winter wheat production. Agron. J. 68:919–922.Google Scholar
26. Stahlman, P. W. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) interference and economic thresholds in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 38:224–228.Google Scholar
27. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Pages 173–233 in Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
28. Thill, D. C., Beck, K. G., and Callihan, R. H. 1984. The biology of downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:7–12.Google Scholar
29. Upadhyaya, M. K., Turkington, R., and McIlvride, D. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 75. Bromus tectorum L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:689–709.Google Scholar
30. Waldren, R. P. and Flowerday, A. D. 1979. Growth stages and distribution of dry matter, N, P, and K in winter wheat. Agron. J. 71:391–397.Google Scholar
31. Walker, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. 30, Suppl. 1:17–24.Google Scholar
32. Wicks, G. A. 1984. Integrated systems for control and management of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in cropland. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:26–31.Google Scholar
33. Wicks, G. A. and Smika, D. E. 1990. Central Great Plains. Pages 127–157 in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar