Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:34:15.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isozyme Variability and Breeding Systems in Populations of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Jodie S. Holt
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521

Abstract

The importance of seeds in the reproduction and maintenance of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) populations was evaluated. Isozyme analysis using starch gel electrophoresis was performed on 20 individuals of each of 10 widely separate populations in California. Genetic variation among individuals served as an indicator of the relative importance of asexual and sexual reproduction in each population. Eight enzyme systems were assayed from which 12 loci were resolvable, with four of those loci exhibiting variability. A maximum of four isozyme genotypes appeared in any population; only nine of 81 total potential genotypes were identified. Five populations were isozymically uniform, apparently composed of a single genotype. The remaining five populations were genotypically variable; these frequently deviated strongly from the genotype frequencies expected of a sexually reproducing population. These results indicate that sexually produced seeds are unimportant in the maintenance of yellow nutsedge populations in agricultural environments. Although viable seed may be produced, tubers appear to be the primary mode of reproduction in this species.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, A.D.H. and Marshall, B. E. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. Pages 351363 in Evolution Today. Proc. 2d. Int. Congr. Syst. Evol. Biol. Google Scholar
2. Clayton, J. W. and Trietiak, D. N. 1972. Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29:11691172.Google Scholar
3. Costa, J. and Appleby, A. P. 1976. Response of two yellow nutsedge varieties to three herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:5458.Google Scholar
4. Garg, D. K., Bendixen, L. E., and Anderson, S. R. 1967. Rhizome differentiation in yellow nutsedge. Weeds 15:124128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7:146.Google Scholar
6. Gottlieb, L. D. 1982. Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. Science 216:373380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Hartl, D. L. 1980. The Hardy-Weinberg Law. Pages 93102 in Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
8. Hill, E. R., Lachman, W. H., and Maynard, D. N. 1963. Reproductive potential of yellow nutsedge by seed. Weeds 11:160161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hill, E. R. 1965. Translocation of amitrole in yellow nutsedge and its effect on seed germination. Weeds 11:165166.Google Scholar
10. Holm, L. G., Plunckett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Cyperus esculentus L. Pages 125133 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
11. Justice, O. L. and Whitehead, M. D. 1946. Seed production, viability, and dormancy in the nutgrasses Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus . J. Agric. Res. 73:303318.Google Scholar
12. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Influence of yellow nutsedge competition on furrow irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 23:171175.Google Scholar
13. Loveless, M. D. and Hamrick, J. L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:6595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lyman, J. C. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Clonal diversity in Taraxacum officinale (Compositae), an apomict. Heredity 53: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mulligan, G. H. and Junkins, B. E. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. 17. Cyperus esculentus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:339350.Google Scholar
16. Pichersky, E. and Gottlieb, L. D. 1983. Evidence for duplication of the structrual genes coding plastid and cytosolic isozymes of triose phosphate isomerase in diploid Clarkia . Genetics 105: 421436.Google Scholar
17. Richardson, R. H. and Smouse, P. E. 1976. Patterns of molecular variation. I. Interspecific comparisons of electromorphs in the Drosophila mulleri complex. Biochem. Genet. 14:447466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Roose, M. and Gottlieb, L. D. 1976. Genetic and biochemical consequences of polyploidy in Tragopogon . Evolution 30:818830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Spencer, N., Hopkins, D. A., and Harris, H. 1984. Phosphoglucomutase polymorphism in man. Nature 204:742745.Google Scholar
20. Steiner, E. and Levin, D. A. 1977. Allozyme, SI gene, cytological and morphological polymorphisms in a population of Oenothera biennis . Evolution 31:127133.Google Scholar
21. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Yellow nutsedge shoot emergence and tuber longevity. Weed Sci. 21:7681.Google Scholar
22. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:3237.Google Scholar
23. Swofford, D. L. and Selander, R. B. 1981. Biosys-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72:281283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J. 1983. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
25. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1975. Yellow nutsedge sprouting and resprouting potential. Weed Sci. 23:333337.Google Scholar
26. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1979. Seed production and germination in Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus . Weed Sci. 27:502505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Tumbleson, M. E. and Kommedahl, T. 1961. Reproductive potential of Cyperus esculentus by tubers. Weeds 9:646653.Google Scholar