Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:29:47.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intraspecific Competition of Hydrilla verticillata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Sutton ,
R. C. Littell  and
K. A. Langeland
David L. Sutton
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Agric. Res. Center, 3205 SW 70th Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
R. C. Littell
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Dep. of Statistics, Gainesville, FL 32611
K. A. Langeland
Affiliation:
Fort Lauderdale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies in outdoor, circular pools have shown that one shoot tip of hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata Royle) produced as much plant dry weight during a 16-week period as 16 tips planted under the same conditions. Dry weight of plants 16 weeks after planting was as high as 1,561 times that of the shoot tips planted. Tubers were present within 8 weeks after planting the tips; higher numbers of these vegetative propagules were associated with the higher number of tips planted. Plants under a photoperiod of 11.5 h or less produced more tubers than those exposed to 12 h or more of light.

Keywords

Aquatic weedstuberssubmersed plantsphotoperiod
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , July 1980 , pp. 425 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackburn, R. D., Weldon, L. W., Yeo, R. R., and Taylor, T. M. 1969. Identification and distribution of similar appearing aquatic weeds in Florida. Hyacinth Control J. 8:11–21.Google Scholar
2. Bowes, G., Holaday, A. S., and Mailer, W. T. 1979. Seasonal variation in the biomass, tuber density, and photosynthetic metabolism of hydrilla in three Florida lakes. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 17:61–65.Google Scholar
3. Haller, W. T., Miller, J. L., and Garrard, L. A. 1976. Seasonal production and germination of hydrilla vegetative propagules. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 14:26–29.Google Scholar
4. Mitra, E. 1964. Contributions to our knowledge of Indian freshwater plants. 4. On some aspects of the morphological and anatomical studies of turions of Hydrilla verticillata (Linn. F.) Royle. J. Asiat. Soc., Sci. 6:17–27.Google Scholar
5. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. N.Y. 479 pp.Google Scholar
6. Sutton, D. L., Vandiver, V. V. Jr., Hestand, R. S., and Miley, W. W. II. 1979. Use of the grass carp for control of hydrilla in small ponds. Pages 91–102 in Shireman, J. V., ed. Proc. Grass Carp Conf. Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
7. Van, T. K., Haller, W. T., and Bowes, G. 1976. Comparison of the photosynthetic characteristics of three submersed aquatic plants. Plant Physiol. 58:761–768.Google Scholar
8. Van, T. K., Haller, W. T., and Garrard, L. A. 1978. The effect of day length and temperature on hydrilla growth and tuber production. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 16:57–59.Google Scholar