Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:55:12.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The interaction of pyridate and 2,4-DB in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. Vint Hicks
Affiliation:
Valent Corporation, 7607 Eastmark Drive, Suite 108, College Station, TX 77840
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
1733 North Longgrove Road, Cecilia, KY 42724

Abstract

Tank-mixed combinations of pyridate and 2,4-DB were synergistic with respect to sicklepod control and independent with respect to Florida beggarweed control and peanut tolerance in greenhouse studies. Leaf absorption of 14C-pyridate was generally enhanced by the addition of 2,4-DB. Translocation of 14C-pyridate out of the treated leaf did exceed 21% of the amount absorbed across all species, and 14C-pyridate was not affected by the addition of 2,4-DB. Sensitivity of peanut, Florida beggarweed, and sicklepod to pyridate was independent of both adsorption and translocation. Metabolic detoxification of pyridate into a benign metabolite was highest in the tolerant peanut, lowest in highly susceptible Florida beggarweed, and intermediate in slightly susceptible sicklepod. Absorption of 14C-2,4-DB by peanut was increased by approximately 10% with the addition of pyridate. No such increase was observed in either Florida beggarweed or sicklepod. Translocation of 14C-2,4-DB out of the treated leaf was not affected by the addition of pyridate in any of the three species evaluated.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15: 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Prado, R., Sanchez, M., Jorrin, J., and Dominguez, C. 1992. Negative cross-resistance to bentazone and pyridate in atrazine-resistant Amaranthus cruentus and Amaranthus hybridus biorypes. Pestic. Sci. 35: 131136.Google Scholar
Gaillardon, P., Guichaoua, J. C., Gasquez, J., and Scalla, R. 1989. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of pyridate in a tolerant crop (Zea mays L.) and two susceptible weeds (Polygonum lapathifolium L. and Chenopodium album L.). Weed Res. 29: 4551.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Evron, Y. 1992. Pyridate is not a two-site inhibitor, and may be more prone to evolution of resistance than other phenolic herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 44: 140146.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 1987. Nutsedge control in peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40: 54.Google Scholar
Hawf, L. R. and Behrens, R. 1974. Selectivity factors in response of plants to 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22: 245249.Google Scholar
Hicks, T. V., Wehtje, G. R., and Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Weed control in peanuts with pyridate. Weed Technol. 4: 493495.Google Scholar
Ketchersid, M. L., Boswell, T. E., and Merkle, M. G. 1978. Effect of 2,4-DB on yield and pod development of peanuts. Peanut Sci. 5: 3539.Google Scholar
Koren, E., Goldschmidt, Y., Mermelstein, M., Karni, Y., Hollander, E., and Ovadia, S. 1985. Control of weeds in peanuts with ethalfluralin and pyridate. Phytoparasitica 13: 262.Google Scholar
Wathana, S., Corbin, F. T., and Waldrep, T. W. 1972. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-DB in soybean and cocklebur. Weed Sci. 20: 120123.Google Scholar
Zohner, A. 1987. Mode of crop tolerance to pyridate in corn and peanuts. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 10B-2:1083-1090.Google Scholar
Zohner, A. and Bodingbauer, H. R. 1988. Mode of action of and selectivity of pyridate in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41: 359.Google Scholar