Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:09:09.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of Siduron Tolerance in Foxtail Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. B. Schooler ,
A. R. Bell  and
John D. Nalewaja
A. B. Schooler
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota 58102
A. R. Bell
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota 58102
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota 58102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thirty-six collections of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum L.) from North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Montana varied in susceptibility to 1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)-3-phenylurea (siduron) as determined from radicle elongation of treated seeds. Data from F2 seedlings of crosses between tolerant and susceptible selections indicated that three complementary dominant factors control the inheritance of siduron tolerance in foxtail barley. Evolution of siduron-tolerant foxtail barley could occur from selection pressure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 167 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Comstock, V. E. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. An inheritance study of tolerance to atrazine in a cross of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Crop Sci. 8:508–509.Google Scholar
2. Grogan, C. O., Eastin, E. F., and Palmer, R. D. 1963. Inheritance of susceptibility of a line of maize to simazine and atrazine. Crop Sci. 3:451.Google Scholar
3. Hayes, J. D. 1959. Varietal resistance to spray damage in barley. Nature 183:551–552.Google Scholar
4. Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18:253–255.Google Scholar
5. Jacobsohn, R. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. Differential response of wild oat lines to diallate, triallate, and barban. Weed Sci. 16:491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rache, B. F. and Muzik, T. J. 1964. Ecological and physiological study of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. and response of its biotypes to sodium 2,2-dichloropropionate (dalapon). Agron. J. 56:155–160.Google Scholar
7. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–615.Google Scholar
8. Santelmann, P. W. and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and S. faberii . Weeds 9:406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schooler, A. B. 1960. The effect of gibrel and gibberellic acid (K salt) in embryo culture media for Hordeum vulgare . Agron. J. 52:411.Google Scholar
10. Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility influences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12:19–22.Google Scholar
11. Smith, L. 1951. Cytology and genetics of barley. Bot. Rev. 17:1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Stafford, R. E., Comstock, V. E., and Ford, J. H. Inheritance of tolerance in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) treated with MCPA. Crop Sci. 8:423–426.Google Scholar
13. Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected lines of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15:275–280.Google Scholar
14. Wiebe, G. A. and Hayes, J. D. 1960. The role of genetics in the use of agricultural chemicals. Agron. J. 52:685–687.Google Scholar