Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:12:56.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of wild radish on yield and quality of canola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw ,
Deirdre Lemerle ,
Rodney Mailer  and
Ken R. Young
Deirdre Lemerle
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
Rodney Mailer
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
Ken R. Young
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Doobie College, VIC 3647, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild radish is a prevalent annual weed throughout the cropping regions of southern Australia. Field experiments were conducted at Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, in 1998 and 1999 to determine the effect of various densities and emergence times of wild radish on yield and quality of canola and on wild radish seed production. As few as 4 wild radish m−2 emerging with canola reduced canola yield 9 to 11%, whereas 64 wild radish m−2 reduced canola yield 77 to 91%. Wild radish interference in canola was greatly affected by its time of emergence relative to canola. At 64 wild radish m−2, canola yield was reduced 77, 54, 33, and 19% in 1998 and 91, 65, 56, and 19% in 1999 when wild radish emerged 0, 2, 4, and 7 wk after canola, respectively. Wild radish that emerged 10 wk after canola did not reduce canola yield. Maximum wild radish seed production ranged from 24,183 to 32,167 seed m−2 when they emerged with canola at high densities. Wild radish that emerged later than canola produced much less seed, but some seed production still occurred in one of the 2 yr when it emerged as late as 10 wk after canola. Wild radish did not directly reduce canola quality in either year, but if wild radish seed were not separated from canola seed, the amount of erucic acid and glucosinolates was increased above marketable levels in some cases. The results of this study will be used to advise growers on wild radish control in canola and will aid the development of a multiyear management strategy for this troublesome weed in annual cropping systems.

Keywords

Wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRAcanola, Brassica napus L. ‘Oscar’Erucic acidglucosinolatesoil contentweed emergenceweed interferenceweed seed production
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 344 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cheam, A. H. 1986. Seed production and seed dormancy in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) and some possibilities for improving control. Weed Res. 26:405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheam, A. H. and Code, G. R. 1995. The biology of Australian weeds. 24. Raphanus raphanistrum L. Plant Prot. Q. 10:1–13.Google Scholar
Code, G. R. and Donaldson, T. W. 1996. Effect of cultivation, sowing methods and herbicides on wild radish populations in wheat crops. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36:437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, G. R. and Reeves, T. G. 1981. Chemical control of wild radish in wheat. Pages 59–63 In Proceedings of the 6th Australian Weed Conference. Gold Coast, Queensland.Google Scholar
Code, G. R., Reeves, T. G., Brooke, H. D., and Piggin, C. M. 1978. The herbicidal control of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.). Pages 241–247 In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Council of Australian Weed Science Societies. Melbourne: Australian Weed Science Societies.Google Scholar
Colton, B., Butler, B., and Milne, B. 1997. Using Triazine Herbicides in Canola. Agnote DPI/183. Australia: NSW Agriculture.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R., Bawija, R., Vaths, J., and Schofield, M. 1993. Comparative biology of cruciferous weeds: a preliminary study. Pages 376–380 in Proceedings of the 10th Australian and 14th Asian-Pacific Weed Conference.Google Scholar
Daun, J. K., DeClercq, D. R., and McGregor, D. I. 1989. Glucosinolate Analysis of Canola and Raspeseed. Method of the Canadian Grain Commission Grain Research Lab. 3rd ed. Winnipeg, MB: Agriculture Canada. 9 p.Google Scholar
Dellow, J. J. and Milne, B. R. 1987. Wild Radish. Australia: Department of Agriculture, New South Wales Agfacts, Agdex 642.Google Scholar
Holm, L., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds—Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. p. 542.Google Scholar
Howard, H. K. and Daun, J. K. 1991. Oil concentration determination in oilseeds by NMR. Method of the Canadian Grain Commission Grain Research Lab. Winnipeg, MB: Agriculture Canada. 5 p.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Blackshaw, R. E., Smith, A. B., Potter, T. D., and Marcroft, S. J. 2001. Comparative survey of weeds surviving in triazine-tolerant and conventional canola crops in south-eastern Australia. Plant Prot. Q. 16:37–40.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D., Gilbey, D. J., and D’Antuono, M. F. 1988. Survival and fecundity of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) plants in relation to cropping, time of emergence and chemical control. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 39:385–397.Google Scholar
Preston, C., Roush, R. T., and Powles, S. B. 1999. Herbicide resistance in weeds of southern Australia: why are we the worst in the world? Pages 454–459 In Proceedings of the 12th Australian Weeds Conference. Hobart, Tasmania.Google Scholar
Reeves, T. G., Code, G. R., and Piggin, C. M. 1981. Seed production and longevity, seasonal emergence, and phenology of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.). Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 21:524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, R. C. 1981. Weeds of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in North America. J. Arnold Arboretum 62:517–540.Google Scholar
Salisbury, P. and Mailer, R. 1987. Useful variability in Australian populations of weedy crucifers. Pages 122–125 in Proceedings of the 6th Australian Rapeseed, Agronomists, and Breeders Workshop, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Steel, R.D.G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 401–437.Google Scholar