Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:58:19.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Site of Uptake of Fluridone on Early Development of Soybean (Glycine max) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Z. E. Rafii  and
F. M. Ashton
Z. E. Rafii
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
F. M. Ashton
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The double pot technique was used to study the effects of uptake site of fluridone {1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl—phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone} on early shoot and root development of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams’] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala SJ-1′). Soybean is susceptible and cotton is resistant to fluridone. Root uptake in soybean resulted in increased shoot length in the epicotyl and shoot apex, reduced shoot fresh weight, chlorosis of primary and trifoliolate leaves, as well as reduced root length, branching, and fresh weight. Shoot uptake resulted in reduced shoot length above the hypocotyl, reduced shoot weight, severe chlorosis of primary leaves, and inhibition of trifoliolate leaf formation. The reduction in the root length, branching, and weight was less by shoot uptake than by root uptake. In cotton, root uptake resulted in reduced shoot length in the epicotyl and shoot apex, slight reduction in shoot weight, no effect on chlorosis of cotyledon leaves, moderate to slight chlorosis of the true leaves, and no effect on root length, branching, or fresh weight. Shoot uptake resulted in reduced length of all shoot components and shoot weight, chlorosis of cotyledon leaves and the true leaves, and reduced root length, branching, and weight. Compared to soybean, cotton required much higher fluridone concentrations to show the above effects. It was generally concluded that in soybean, uptake by both the root and the shoot contributed significantly to the injury, whereas in cotton, shoot uptake was relatively more important.

Keywords

Shootrootherbicides
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 321 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Albritton, R. and Parka, S. J. 1978. Studies evaluating the site of fluridone uptake by fourteen crop and ten weed species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:253–259.Google Scholar
2. Bartels, P. G. and Watson, C. W. 1978. Inhibition of carotenoid synthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci. 26:198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Berard, D. F., Rainey, D. P., and Lin, C. C. 1978. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of fluridone in selected crop species. Weed Sci. 26:252–254.Google Scholar
4. Eshel, Y. and Prendeville, G. N. 1967. A technique for studying root vs. shoot uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fadayomi, Omosuyi and Warren, G. F. 1977. Uptake and translocation of nitrofen and oxyfluorfen. Weed Sci. 25:111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. No. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
7. Nishomoto, R. K. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Site of uptake, movement, and activity of DCPA. Weed Sci. 19:152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Prendeville, G. N., Eshel, Y., Schreiber, M. M., and Warren, G. F. 1967. Site of uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Waldrep, T. W. and Taylor, H. M. 1976. 1-methyl-3-phenyl-5[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-(1H)-pyridine, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:1250–1251.Google Scholar