Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:36:08.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Moisture on Soil-Incorporated Diclofop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christiaan E. G. Mulder
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102

Abstract

The influence of soil moisture on wild oat control from soil-incorporated methyl ester of diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-phenoxy] propanoic} was determined in the greenhouse. Wild oat control with soil-incorporated diclofop at 1.5 or 3 ppmw increased linearly when soil moisture in a Tiffany sandy loam increased from 18.5 to 23.5% (75% to 125% of field capacity). The efficacy of soil-incorporated diclofop was not reduced when soil moisture was allowed to decrease from 21 (field capacity) to 18.5, 16, 13.5, or 11% (wilting point) before rewatering to 21%. The soil moisture level at the time of herbicide application determined the degree of wild oat control with soil-incorporated diclofop. Wild oat control with diclofop increased when a Tiffany sandy loam with 16% moisture (50% of field capacity) at the time of herbicide application, was watered to field capacity after 8 or 12 days delay, and control did not change with watering to field capacity at the time of herbicide application or when delayed 4 or 16 days. The movement of 14C-diclofop in soil columns was greater within coarse than fine textured soils and increased with water volumes applied, regardless of soil type. Further, the leachability of 14C-diclofop was two and a half times greater than that of 14C-trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L. J. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil. Pages 111161 in Audus, L. J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
2. Bode, L. E., Day, C. L., Gebhardt, M. R., and Goering, C. E. 1973. Prediction of trifluralin diffusion coefficients. Weed Sci. 21:485489.Google Scholar
3. Bowen, J. E. 1967. Influence of environmental factors on the efficacy of preemergence diuron applications. Weeds 15:317322.Google Scholar
4. Burt, G. W. and Akinsorotan, A. O. 1976. Factors affecting thiocarbamate injury to corn. I. Temperature and soil moisture. Weed Sci. 24:319321.Google Scholar
5. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141147.Google Scholar
6. Grover, R. 1966. Influence of organic matter, texture, and available water on the toxicity of simazine in soil. Weeds 14:148152.Google Scholar
7. Grover, R. 1977. Mobility of dicamba, picloram, and 2,4-D in soil columns. Weed Sci. 25:159162.Google Scholar
8. Chancellor, R. J. 1976. Growth and development of wild oat plants. Pages 9092 in Jones, D. P. ed. Wild oats in World Agriculture. Agric. Res. Council, London.Google Scholar
9. Hammerton, J. L. 1967. Environmental factors and susceptibility to herbicides. Weeds 15:330336.Google Scholar
10. Koren, E., Foy, C. L., and Ashton, F. M. 1969. Adsorption, volatility, and migration of thiocarbamate herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 17:148153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lavy, T. L., Messersmith, C. G., and Knoche, H. W. 1972. Direct liquid scintillation radioassay of 14C-labeled herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 20:215219.Google Scholar
12. Menges, R. M. and Tamez, S. 1974. Movement and persistence of bensulide and trifluralin in irrigated soil. Weed Sci. 22:6771.Google Scholar
13. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1975. Postemergence application of triallate for wild oat control. Weed Sci. 23:137141.Google Scholar
14. Stickler, R. L., Knake, E. L., and Hinesley, T. D. 1969. Soil moisture and effectiveness of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:257259.Google Scholar
15. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:914.Google Scholar
16. Weber, J. 1972. Interaction of organic pesticides with particulate matter in aquatic and soil systems. Advances in Chemistry Series III. Am. Chem. Soc. Google Scholar
17. Wu, C. and Santelmann, P. W. 1976. Phytotoxicity and soil activity of HOE-23408. Weed Sci. 24:601604.Google Scholar
18. Wu, C., Santelmann, P. W., and Davidson, J. M. 1974. Influence of soil temperature and moisture on terbutryn activity and persistence. Weed Sci. 22:571574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar