Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:05:51.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Foam Adjuvants on Activity of Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. G. Mccall ,
C. J. Scifres  and
M. G. Merkle
H. G. Mccall
Affiliation:
Dep. of Range Sci., Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
C. J. Scifres
Affiliation:
Dep. of Range Sci., Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
M. G. Merkle
Affiliation:
Dep. of Range Sci., Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three blended foam adjuvants increased 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] uptake from aqueous solutions by detached live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) leaves as compared to uptake from water alone. There were no differences in honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz.) D.C. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell] control with 2,4,5-T or 1:1 combinations of 2,4,5-T with picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) or with dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) at 0.56 kg/ha whether applied in water + 0.5% (v/v) foam adjuvant or in a diesel oil: water (1:4, v/v) emulsion. Residual life of picloram in native forages was not extended by foam carrier as compared to water, water and surfactant, and diesel oil:water emulsion as carrier. Foam generation from adjuvants with expansion ratios (ER) of two to four was less susceptible to alteration from addition of commercially-formulated herbicides than was an adjuvant with an ER of seven. Foam adjuvant ER's increased in a curvilinear fashion as water temperature was increased from 5 to 50 C.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , July 1974 , pp. 384 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akesson, N.B., Wilce, S.E., and Yates, W.E. 1971. Confining aerial applications to treated fields–a realistic goal. Agrichem. Age (Dec). pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
2. Baur, J.R., Bovey, R.W., Baker, R.D., and Riley, I. 1971. Absorption and penetration of picloram and 2,4,5-T into detached live oak leaves. Weed Sci. 19:138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Baur, J.R., Bovey, R.W., and Smith, J.D. 1969. Herbicide concentrations in live oak treated with mixtures of picloram and 2,4,5-T. Weed Sci. 17:567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bouse, L.F. and Leerskov, R.E. 1973. Drift comparisons of low-expansion foams and conventional sprays. Weed Sci. 21: 405–409.Google Scholar
5. Braud, H.J., Esphahani, M., and Chesness, J.L. 1969. Generation of agricultural foam. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. Paper No. 69–617. 27 PP.Google Scholar
6. Jansen, L.L. 1964. Surfactant enhancement of herbicide entry. Weeds 12:251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Loy, T.R. 1973. Results with air-emulsion application of herbicides. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:447–449.Google Scholar
8. Simonovitch, D., Ball, W.L., Desjardins, R., and Gamble, D.S. 1967. Use of protein-based foams to protect plants against frost. Can. J. Plant Sci. 47:10–17.Google Scholar
9. Scifres, C.J., Baur, J.R., and Bovey, R.W. 1973. Absorption of 2,4,5-T applied in various carriers to honey mesquite. Weed Sci. 21:94–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Scifres, C.J., Hahn, R.R., and Merkle, M.G. 1971. Dissipation of picloram from vegetation of semiarid rangelands. Weed Sci. 19:329–332.Google Scholar