Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:05:47.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Environment on Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance to Sethoxydim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Fawcett
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Robert G. Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
W. Eugene Arnold
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57006
Thomas T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Botany Dep., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN 47907
Charlotte V. Eberlein
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop & Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Loren J. Moshier
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361

Abstract

Corn (Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3732′) showed little to no injury following the postemergence-directed application of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio) propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} plus crop oil concentrate (COC) at 56 g/ha plus 1.25% (v/v) at nine locations across Midwestern U.S. in 1984 and 1985. Little corn injury also occurred for the postemergence-directed application of sethoxydim plus COC at 110 g/ha plus 1.25% (v/v) at most locations in both years. Considerable variation in tolerance was seen across locations for over-the-top applications of sethoxydim at all rates tested and for the directed application at 220 g/ha. Although corn at most locations showed no yield reduction with the over-the-top application of sethoxydim plus COC at 56 g/ha plus 1.25% (v/v), a 70% yield reduction occurred in one location in one year. For an over-the-top application of sethoxydim plus COC at 110 g/ha plus 1.25% (v/v), yields ranged from 3 to 95% of the untreated check in 1984, and from 3 to 88% in 1985. Stand reductions from an over-the-top application of sethoxydim plus COC at 220 g/ha plus 1.25% (v/v) ranged from 0 to 99%. A significant negative correlation was found between yield of corn treated over the top with sethoxydim and precipitation on the day of application and in the week following application. Air temperature on the day of application was positively correlated with corn injury from over-the-top and directed sethoxydim applications, but no correlation existed between percent relative humidity and corn injury. Open pan evaporation and solar radiation before and after application were not correlated with corn injury from sethoxydim.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Herbicidal activity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim in soil. Weed Sci. 32:824831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Charvat, L. D. and Kinsella, J. 1983. Volunteer corn control in soybeans with sethoxydim. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:2122.Google Scholar
4. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chernicky, J. P. and Slife, F. W. 1986. Effects of sublethal concentrations of bentazon, fluazifop, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:171174.Google Scholar
6. Davies, L. G., Cobb, A. H., and Taylor, F. E. 1979. The susceptibility of Chenopodium album to bentazon under different environmental conditions. Proc. European Weed Res. Soc. Symp. The Influence of Different Factors on the Development and Control of Weeds. Mainz. Pages 97104.Google Scholar
7. Davis, D. G., Mullins, J. S., Stolzenberg, G. E., and Booth, G. D. 1979. Permeation of organic molecules of widely differing solutions and of water through isolated cuticles of orange leaves. Pestic. Sci. 10:1931.Google Scholar
8. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:534539.Google Scholar
9. Dowler, C. C. and Parker, M. B. 1975. Soybean weed control systems in two southern coastal plain states. Weed Sci. 23:198202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fawcett, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1984. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) control in corn. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Pages 12.Google Scholar
11. Fawcett, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1985. Postemergence-directed herbicide applications for wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) control in corn. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Pages 1920.Google Scholar
12. Fawcett, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1986. Corn tolerance to sethoxydim. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 26:56.Google Scholar
13. Hamilton, K. C. and Arle, H. F. 1970. Directed applications of herbicides in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 18:8588.Google Scholar
14. Hosaka, H., Inaba, H., and Ishikawa, H. 1984. Response of monocotyledons to BAS 9052 OH. Weed Sci. 32:2832.Google Scholar
15. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 25:448451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.Google Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D. and Woznica, Z. 1985. Environment and chlorosulfuron phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 3 3:395399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., Rogers, R. L., and Mowers, R. P. 1983. Performance of BAS 9052 applied to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:796800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Samir, S. H. and Russ, O. G. 1981. Response of volunteer corn and soybeans to diclofop or sethoxydim as influenced by corn height, carrier volume, herbicide rate, and corn cultivars. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:25.Google Scholar
20. Swisher, B. A. and Corbin, F. T. 1982. Behavior of BAS-9052 OH in soybean (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) plant and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 30:640650.Google Scholar
21. Teasdale, J. R. and Thimijan, R. W. 1983. Influence of light and temperature on bentazon phytotoxicity to cucumber (Cucumber sativus). Weed Sci. 31:232235.Google Scholar
22. Wills, G. D. 1984. Toxicity and translocation of sethoxydim in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) as affected by the environment. Weed Sci. 32:2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar