Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:54:38.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Cultivation Timing on Chemical Control of Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw ,
Larry J. Newsom  and
Clyde A. Smith
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Clyde A. Smith
Affiliation:
Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cultivation timings were used in conjunction with postemergence herbicides to determine their effect on sicklepod control in soybean. Treatments using cultivation alone resulted in less than 70% sicklepod control. A postemergence application of chlorimuron following metribuzin applied postemergence was usually more effective in controlling sicklepod with cultivation 7 days after application than with cultivation 3 days before or at application, or with no cultivation. Cultivation at any timing in conjunction with a postemergence application of imazaquin following imazaquin preemergence improved sicklepod control compared to imazaquin without cultivation. Sicklepod control with chlorimuron postemergence followed by cultivation 7 days after application was as good as or better than two sequential applications of chlorimuron with no cultivation. Imazaquin or metribuzin preemergence followed only by cultivation provided less than 80% control in two of three experiments.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6 - methoxy - 2 - pyrimidinyl)ami no] - carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1 - dimethylethyl) - 3 - (methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onesicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrChlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinCASOB
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Chapter 3: Sulfonylurea herbicides. Pages 117–190 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C., Walker, R. H., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficiency of chemical and mechanical methods for controlling weeds in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 32:584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogea). Weed Sci. 28:401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:258–262.Google Scholar
5. Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Weed management in minimum-tillage peanuts (Arachis hypogea) as influenced by cultivar, row spacing, and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:233–237.Google Scholar
6. Creel, J. M., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Effects of rainfall and temperature on postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025. Weed Sci. 35:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor, and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216–223.Google Scholar
10. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1983. Longevity of weed seeds after 5.5 years in the Stoneville 50-year buried study. Weed Sci. 31:264–270.Google Scholar
11. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., Nichols, R. L., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Effects of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Sci. 30:602–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Peters, E. J., Davis, F. S., Klingman, D. L., and Larson, R. E. 1961. Interrelations of cultivations, herbicides and methods of application of weed control in soybeans. Weeds 9:639–645.Google Scholar
13. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar
14. Shaw, D. R. 1987. Sicklepod control in soybeans with Canopy, Scepter, and Classic. Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 12, No. 20. 4 pp.Google Scholar
15. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., and Snipes, C. E. 1989. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max) grown in rotations of 97- and 18-cm row spacings. Weed Sci. 37:748–752.Google Scholar
17. Shaw, D. R., Snipes, C. E., and Whatley, L. L. 1986. Chemical control of sicklepod in soybeans. Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 11, No. 12. 4 pp.Google Scholar
18. Smith, C. A., Shaw, D. R., and Wixson, M. B. 1990. Reducing sicklepod interference with soybeans by preplant applications of imazaquin or chlorimuron plus metribuzin. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 30:161.Google Scholar
19. Snipes, C. E., Walker, R. H., Whitwell, T., Buchanan, G. A., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficacy and economics of weed control methods in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 32:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Staniforth, D. W. and Wiese, A. F. 1985. Chapter 2: Weed biology and its relationship to weed control in limited-tillage systems. Pages 18–20 in Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited-Tillage Systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
21. Teem, D. S., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68–71.Google Scholar
22. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar