Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:25:34.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of cohorts on Chenopodium album demography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dawit Mulugeta  and
David E. Stoltenberg
Dawit Mulugeta
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
David E. Stoltenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
*
Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peak germination and emergence of common lambsquarters usually occur in early to mid-spring, but both processes can occur during summer and fall. Seeds produced by different common lambsquarters cohorts (seedlings that emerge at nearly the same time) may vary in dormancy status, response to environmental conditions, and response to management factors. Therefore, experiments were conducted to determine the influence of different cohorts on common lambsquarters demography. Field experiments determined plant density, biomass, and seed production of different common lambsquarters cohorts within a crop-free community of annual weed species that included redroot pigweed, giant foxtail, and velvetleaf. Common lambsquarters plant density and aboveground biomass were greater for a mid-May cohort than for early June, late June, mid-July, or early August cohorts, but seed production of the mid-May and early June cohorts did not differ (about 192,000 seeds m−2) and was greater than that of other cohorts (111,500 seeds m−2 or less). In the laboratory, percent germination prior to stratification (exposure of seeds to low temperatures) was less for seeds harvested from early May and late May cohorts (≥ 9%) than those of mid-June or early July cohorts (≤ 75%). After stratification in the field, percent emergence (seedlings per number of planted seeds) and mean emergence time were similar among early May, late May, mid-June, and early July cohort seed sources, and were not influenced by shallow burial in soil. These results suggest that recruitment from seeds produced by different common lambsquarters cohorts is similar, but proportional to the number of seeds produced by each cohort.

Keywords

Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTHSeed burialseedling emergenceseed germinationseed production
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 65 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C. C. 1977. Role of temperature in the germination ecology of three summer annual weeds. Oecologia (Berl.) 30: 377–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1987. Temperature requirements for after-ripening in buried seeds of four summer annual weeds. Weed Res. 27: 385–389.Google Scholar
Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 32. Chenopodium album L. Can J. Plant Sci. 58: 1061–1072.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci. 35: 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Mester, T. C., and Kohler, K. A. 1996. The effect of maize residues and tillage on emergence of Setaria faberi, Abutilon theophrasti, Amaranthus retroflexus, and Chenopodium album . Weed Res. 36: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D. L., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, B. G. 1963. The dependence of germination on photoperiod, light quality and temperature in Chenopodium spp. Can. J. Bot. 41: 1211–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervio, L. 1971. The effect of intraspecific competition on the development of Chenopodium album . Weed Res. 11: 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res. 32: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seed banks of the US corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40: 636–644.Google Scholar
Grundy, A. C., Mead, A., and Bond, W. 1996. Modelling the effect of weed-seed distribution in the soil profile on seedling emergence. Weed Res. 36: 375–384.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. C. 1985. Predicting corn planting dates for moldboard and no-tillage systems in the corn belt. Agron. J. 77: 446–455.Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y. 1992. Maternal effects on seeds during development. Pages 27–59 in Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, UK: C.A.B. International.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K. 1990. Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 38: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, I. E. 1970. The effects of light, potassium nitrate and temperature on the germination of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 10: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Chenopodium album L. Chenopodiaceae, Goosefoot Family. Pages 84–91 in The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Ecology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Karssen, C. M. 1970. The light promoted germination of the seeds of Chenopodium album L. IV. Effects of red, far-red and white light on non-photoblastic seeds incubated in mannitol. Acta Bot. Neerlandica 19: 95–108.Google Scholar
Karssen, C. M. and Bouwmeester, H. J. 1992. Annual dormancy patterns of weed seeds influence weed control. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Congr. Int. Weed Sci. Soc. 2: 98–104.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. 1973. Longevity of crop and weed seeds. Weed Res. 13: 179–191.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33: 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997a. Increased weed emergence and seed bank depletion by soil disturbance in a no-tillage system. Weed Sci. 45: 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997b. Weed and seedbank management with integrated methods as influenced by tillage. Weed Sci. 46: 706–715.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32: 327–335.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Principles of weed ecology. Pages 42–65 in Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12: 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E. 1980. Seed survival and periodicity of seedling emergence in some species of Atriplex, Chenopodium, Polygonum . and Rumex. Ann. Appl. Biol. 94: 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Potter, M. E. 1980. Emergence patterns of weed seedlings in relation to cultivation and rainfall. Weed Res. 20: 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Ricketts, M. E. 1979. Quantitative relationships between the weed flora after cultivation and the seed population in the soil. Weed Res. 19: 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sans, F. X. and Masalles, R. M. 1995. Phenological patterns in an arable land weed community related to disturbance. Weed Res. 35: 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1987. Environmental and chemical manipulation of weed seed dormancy. Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 135–154.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Tan, C. S., and Brain, P. 1988. Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68: 877–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. T. and Harper, J. L. 1965. Seed polymorphism and germination. 1. The influence of nitrates and low temperature on the germination of Chenopodium album . Weed Res. 5: 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in soil. Weed Sci. 40: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar