Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:14:49.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Bentazon on Absorption and Translocation of Sethoxydim in Goosegrass (Eleusine indica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. Neil Rhodes Jr.  and
Harold D. Coble
G. Neil Rhodes Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7627
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7627
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absorption and translocation of sethoxydim {2[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} as influenced by bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] were studied in goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ♯3 ELEIN]. The presence of bentazon in the treatment emulsion decreased foliar absorption of 14C applied as 14C-sethoxydim by about half. Significantly less 14C was found in the treated leaf, shoot tissue above the treated leaf, shoot tissue below the treated leaf, and roots of plants treated with a mixture of 14C-sethoxydim and bentazon than with 14C-sethoxydim alone. After 6 h, 3.5% of applied 14C was recovered from plant parts other than the treated leaf in the absence of bentazon, compared to 1.1% of that applied in combination with bentazon. The difference in foliar absorption between the two treatments may account for the antagonistic interaction between these herbicides observed in the field.

Keywords

Eleusine indicainteractionantagonismtank mixELEIN
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , September 1984 , pp. 595 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beste, C. E. and Schreiber, M. M. 1972. RNA synthesis as the basis for EPTC and 2,4-D antagonism. Weed Sci. 20:8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C., Whitwell, T., and Walker, R. H. 1981. Johnsongrass control in soybeans with postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:50.Google Scholar
3. Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1980. Factors affecting the activity of bentazon with diclofop and BAS 9052. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 101.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. California Agric. Exp. Stn. and Ext. Serv. Manual 35. Page 135.Google Scholar
5. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1979. Antagonistic effects of desmidipham on diclofop activity. Weed Sci. 27:539–544.Google Scholar
6. Hamill, A. S., Smith, L. W., and Switzer, C. M. 1972. Influence of phenoxy herbicides on picloram uptake and phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 20:226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. O'Donovan, J. T. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. The antagonistic action of 2,4-D and bromoxynil on glyphosate phytotoxicity to barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Sci. 30:30–34.Google Scholar
8. Olson, W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Effect of MCPA on 14C-diclofop uptake and translocation. Weed Sci. 30:59–63.Google Scholar
9. O'Sullivan, P. A., Friesen, H. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1977. Influence of herbicides for broadleaved weeds and adjuvants with dichlofop methyl on wild oat control. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:117–125.Google Scholar
10. O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980. Interaction between glyphosate and various herbicides for broadleaved weed control. Weed Res. 20:255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Parker, W. B. and Thompson, L. Jr. 1982. The utility of sethoxydim in soybean weed management systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:54.Google Scholar
12. Qureshi, F. A. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1979. Interaction of dichlofop methyl and MCPA on wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 27:202–205.Google Scholar
13. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., Rogers, R. L., and Crawford, S. H. 1981. Weed control in soybeans with BAS 9052, bentazon and acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:56.Google Scholar
14. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1981. A preliminary investigation of the interaction between BAS 9052 and bentazon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:54.Google Scholar
15. Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29:185–190.Google Scholar
16. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 28:371–377.Google Scholar
17. York, A. C. and Slife, F. W. 1981. Interaction of buthidazole and acetanilide herbicides. Weed Sci. 29:461–468.Google Scholar