Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:52:08.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increased weed emergence and seed bank depletion by soil disturbance in a no-tillage system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dawit Mulugeta
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

The influence of secondary soil disturbance on the emergence pattern and seed bank depletion of an annual weed community in a long-term, no-tillage corn cropping system was determined in 1992 and 1993. As a component of this research, the seed bank was characterized prior to implementation of soil disturbance treatments. The seed bank was initially composed of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and giant foxtail, with approximately 55, 36, and 8% of the total viable seeds, respectively. The remaining 1% was comprised of five other species in 1992 and eight in 1993. The spatial distribution of viable seeds of each species, except common lambsquarters and redroot pigweed, was described by a negative binomial distribution. Three dispersion indices indicated that seeds of individual and total weed species were aggregated and that the level of aggregation of viable seeds of a species was associated with seed density; at lower seed densities, the level of aggregation was greater. Soil disturbance increased common lambsquarters emergence 6-fold in 1992 relative to nondisturbed soil, but did not influence emergence in 1993. Rainfall was about 50% less in 1993. In contrast, soil disturbance increased giant foxtail and redroot pigweed emergence approximately 6- and 3-fold in 1992 and 1993, respectively. Seedling emergence associated with soil disturbance, relative to nondisturbed soil, increased seed bank depletion of common lambsquarters 16-fold in 1992, and giant foxtail and redroot pigweed and average of 6- and 3-fold in 1992 and 1993, respectively. These results indicated that soil disturbance increased seedling emergence and seed bank depletion of the predominant species in the weed community of a long-term, no-tillage system, but that this response was dependent on rainfall for common lambsquarters.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 32. Chenopodium album L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 10611072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. L. 1978. Weed seedling emergence in response to seedbed tillage. M. Sc. thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 74 p.Google Scholar
Bliss, D. and Smith, H. 1985. Penetration of light into soil and its role in the control of seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 8: 475483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci. 35: 12471258.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage system on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36: 642647.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Mester, T. C. 1991. Effect of tillage system on the emergence depth of giant (Setaria faberi) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 39: 200203.Google Scholar
Butts, R. A. and Schaalje, G. B. 1994. Spatial distribution of fall populations of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in winter wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 87: 12301236.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K. 1991. Long-term tillage of seed bank in three Ohio soils. Weed Sci. 39: 186194.Google Scholar
Chauvel, B., Gasquez, J., and Darmency, H. 1989. Changes of weed seed bank parameters according to species, time and environment. Weed Res. 29: 213219.Google Scholar
Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weeds. II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agric. 26: 347357.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1991. Emergence periodicity of six summer annual weed species. Weed Sci. 39: 595600.Google Scholar
Evans, E. 1953. Experimental evidence concerning contagious distributions in ecology. Biometrika 40: 186211.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res. 32: 2938.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seed banks of the US Corn Belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40: 636644.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, J., Drennan, D.S.H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed flora of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, M. R., Daniel, T. C., Schweizer, E. E., and Allmaras, R. R. 1985. Conservation tillage. Science 230: 625630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S. C. 1985. Predicting corn planting dates for moldboard and no-tillage systems in the Corn Belt. Agron. J. 77: 446455.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L., Williams, J. T., and Sager, G. R. 1965. The behavior of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants from seed. J. Ecol. 53: 273286.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A., Alldredge, R., and Fisher, R. 1988. Spatial pattern of downy mildew in hop yards. Phytopathology 78: 13891395.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Mortenson, D. A., Young, L. J., and Martin, A. R. 1995. The stability of weed seedling population models and parameters in eastern Nebraska corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 43: 604611.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E. 1989. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in four tillage systems. Weed Sci. 37: 238249.Google Scholar
Kanji, G. K. 1993. 100 Statistical Tests. London: SAGE Publications. 216 pp.Google Scholar
Karssen, C. M. 1970. The light promoted germination of the seeds of Chenopodium album L. IV. Effects of red, far-red and white light on non-photoblastic seeds incubated in mannitol. Acta Bot. Neerl. 19: 95108.Google Scholar
Kovach, D. A., Thill, D. C., and Young, F. L. 1988. A water-spray system for removing seed from soil. Weed Technol. 2: 338341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R., Logan, T. J., Eckert, D. J., and Dick, W. A. 1994. Conservation tillage in the Corn Belt of the United States. in Carter, M. R., ed. Conservation Tillage in Temperate Agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 76113.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. and Maxwell, B. D. 1991. The horizontal dispersal pattern of weed seed surrogates by farm machinery. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46: 108109.Google Scholar
Lindwall, C. W., Larney, F. J., Johnston, A. M., and Moyer, J. R. 1994. Crop management in conservation tillage systems. in Unger, P. W., ed. Managing Agricultural Residues. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 185209.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. 1967. Mean crowding. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 130.Google Scholar
Lyons, N. J. and Hutcheson, K. 1988. Measures of the dispersion of a population based on ranks. in McDoland, L., Manly, B., Lockwood, J., and Logan, J., eds. Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 370377.Google Scholar
Massey, F. J. Jr. 1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 45: 6878.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997. Seed bank characterization and emergence of a weed community in a moldboard plow system. Weed Sci. 45: 5460.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32: 327335.Google Scholar
Pareja, M. R., Staniforth, D. W., and Pareja, G. P. 1985. Distribution of weed seed among soil structural units. Weed Sci. 33: 182189.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. 1981. Seed banks in the soil. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6: 155.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. 1984. Crop and weed emergence patterns in relation to time of cultivation and rainfall. Ann. Appl. Biol. 105: 263275.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Boddrell, J. E. 1984. Seed survival and seasonal emergence of seedlings of some ruderal plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 617628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12: 316324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Carry, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Schonbeck, M. W. and Egley, G. H. 1980. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) seed germination responses to after-ripening, temperature, ethylene and some other environmental factors. Weed Sci. 28: 543548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirwardana, G. D. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Competition between barnyardgrass (Echinchloa crus-galli) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 32: 218222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1966. Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. London: Methuen, 391 pp.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Sci. 21: 574580.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1986. Water stress-induced germination of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seeds. Weed Sci. 34: 871875.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1959. A quantitative measure of aggregation in insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 52: 11801184.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. F. 1992. The ecology of seed dispersal. in Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, UK: C. A. B., pp. 6185.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effect of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in the soil. Weed Sci. 40: 429433.Google Scholar
Zanin, G., Berti, A., and Zuin, M. C. 1989. Estimation du stock semencier d'un sol labouré ou en semis direct. Weed Res. 29: 407417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar